+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
bigleafbride said:
No. From what ive heard, it is even a ground to revoke your permanent residence because you lied in the application. there are many news articles about this and the immigration remains firm with their policy. if you do not declare it, you can't sponsor a child.

Oh super sad :( hopefully they'll have a chance to bring her son to canada.. im so dissapointed of what i heard.. :( :( ??? ??? ???
 
EUNJAYKC said:
I mean the husband of my sister in law. he was a PR holder 2yrs from now. He did not declared his son as a dependent child before and after he land to canada that time. Her husband came home in the phil last yr dec and they got married. Last 2 months ago Aug they file application family class to cic. Her husband called his Mp whats going on his application and the MP said on oct 1 his application was decision made, the letter will be mailed to him not email. On 18th of Oct her husband got his letter it is stated his application is denied as a sponsor coz his son he did not declared as a dependent child. And then now they try to resolve a problem to his lawyer. If you dont mine what do you think they have a chance to migrate her son to canada? how many percent chances is?

As mentioned several times here, one couldn't bring an "undeclared" child. His application to sponsor was already denied, right? Sure they get a lawyer but that would be "suntok sa buwan." Common case ito and many have tried and failed.
 
bigleafbride said:
The only way i know is appealing by humanitarian reason. To win that case is notbeasy though even for the most experienced lawyer. It is worth a shot, given we are talking about a kid here.

Hopefully they win the case... so that they reunited as well with our lovesone...
 
tabbru said:
As mentioned several times here, one couldn't bring an "undeclared" child. His application to sponsor was already denied, right? Sure they get a lawyer but that would be "suntok sa buwan." Common case ito and many have tried and failed.


:( :( :( :( :(
 
EUNJAYKC said:
Hopefully they win the case... so that they reunited as well with our lovesone...

May we know why he didn't declare his child before?
 
EUNJAYKC said:
Oh super sad :( hopefully they'll have a chance to bring her son to canada.. im so dissapointed of what i heard.. :( :( ??? ??? ???

Can he bring the wife? I read somewhere na even wife cannot be approved. If main applicant ang wife and dependent ang child.
 
tabbru said:
May we know why he didn't declare his child before?

They afraid that he can't go through there in cnda.
 
bigleafbride said:
Can he bring the wife? I read somewhere na even wife cannot be approved. If main applicant ang wife and dependent ang child.

yes pwd parin maisponsored ang wife kc married n cla ung son lng tlga my problem.
 
EUNJAYKC said:
They afraid that he can't go through there in cnda.

Why? May "problema" (i.e. sakit) ba ang bata? He declared his wife but not his child -- it's kinda weird.
 
tabbru said:
Why? May "problema" (i.e. sakit) ba ang bata? He declared his wife but not his child -- it's kinda weird.

he did not declared both of them, since they got already married i dnt thnk so can he sponsor his wife but i knw pwde maispnsord ang wife.
 
tabbru said:
Why? May "problema" (i.e. sakit) ba ang bata? He declared his wife but not his child -- it's kinda weird.

they afraid to tell them the truth/real situation SA PAGKAKAALAM NOON n bka kapg cnbe nya n my anak sya at single bka hnd mkaalis so nagdecide tlga sya hnd ideclared ung son nya before and after he landed in cnda. sympre frst tym immgrant . ok lng pla n ideclared ung child kala namin po hnd pwd bka hnd mkaalis.
 
Ok, let's make this clear ha.

In a common-law relationship (live-in) yung guy and girl before naging PR yung guy. Tapos may anak sila. Eventually, the guy married the girl. Tama po ba?

Kung ganyan ang sitwasyon, at nagsubmit sila ng documents na live-in sila dati pa at may anak sila, malamang pati yung girl hindi ma-approve. The rule is dapat declared yung girl dati pa as "common-law spouse". Kahit kasal na sila ngayon, mauungkat yung past nila. Dapat nga nag-medical din silang mag-ina kahit non-accompanying eh. Yan ang alam ko ha.
 
tabbru said:
Ok, let's make this clear ha.

In a common-law relationship (live-in) yung guy and girl before naging PR yung guy. Tapos may anak sila. Eventually, the guy married the girl. Tama po ba?

Kung ganyan ang sitwasyon, at nagsubmit sila ng documents na live-in sila dati pa at may anak sila, malamang pati yung girl hindi ma-approve. The rule is dapat declared yung girl dati pa as "common-law spouse". Kahit kasal na sila ngayon, mauungkat yung past nila. Dapat nga nag-medical din silang mag-ina kahit non-accompanying eh. Yan ang alam ko ha.

yup ryt. i dnt thnk so kng n declard un n sis in law ko s forms nla. pero malalaman nlng later kng anu sbe ng lawyer bout dun.
well anyway thank u 4 sharing ur thoughts/ideas im a super dissapointed of what i heard but westill hoping for positive chance to migrate his family. :) :)
 
EUNJAYKC said:
yup ryt. i dnt thnk so kng n declard un n sis in law ko s forms nla. pero malalaman nlng later kng anu sbe ng lawyer bout dun.
well anyway thank u 4 sharing ur thoughts/ideas im a super dissapointed of what i heard but westill hoping for positive chance to migrate his family. :) :)

Here's a similar case, I just come across this now lang:

http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/potential-visa-rejection-under-paragraph-1179d-t168971.0.html

Oh well, goodluck sa kanila. Dapat talag magkasama-sama sila as family. ;)
 
Hi! Does anyone knows how to get a police clearance in Singapore? I've work there for 2years and haven't get one until I came back here in manila last year. Thank you!