Baloo said:Hmm, you are a very suspicious person, JUST LIKE ME
It could have been an exercise of smoke and mirrors.
Welcome back Blue elephant man!
Baloo said:Hmm, you are a very suspicious person, JUST LIKE ME
It could have been an exercise of smoke and mirrors.
Baloo said:Hmm, you are a very suspicious person, JUST LIKE ME
It could have been an exercise of smoke and mirrors.
SmoothiesQueen said:As long as the IO's handle it properly...then only positive can come out of this. I think some people are afraid that it could cause some unfair treatment as immigration can be a little unpredictable at times and even and IO can be wrong in their judgment occasionally. They are only human! But I highly doubt it will be a negative thing. I am for it...I believe only real marriages should ever make it across our borders unless people qualify under refugee status and other legitamite means. We can only fit so many people in this country and we are not the answer to EVERYONES problems...no matter how much I'd like to see less people in this world suffer. We need to keep our population under control to enjoy free healthcare, and other benefits of this great country!!
As long as the IO's handle it...I have no problem if it happens to my husband and I. We are together for the long haul...so it really affects us very little!
suva said:but does anybody know when its gonna come into force?
suva said:is there new news on recently proposed spouse sponsorship changes?
missmini said:i often check this link, and the updates section (first on the right); i guess if there's anything new, they will post if there
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/manuals/bulletins/2011/index.asp
suva said:no not yet, most of the crap ppl are opposing it