u4g5 said:if a date is not specified on the bill, the day a bill receives royal assent is the day it goes into full force
chikloo said:My two cents is that after Royal Assent a future date will be set to stop applications in the current process. This is mainly to allow training time for the CO's and also call center representatives. This will take at least 3 months
sicko86 said:There is Report Presentation Followed by Third Reading then Royal Assent.
Today there is nothing scheduled for Bill C-24.
The Bill will pass before the end of next week for sure.
MrB said:There's a meeting today and 4:15pm http://senparlvu.parl.gc.ca/Guide.aspx?viewmode=4&categoryid=-1¤tdate=2014-06-18&eventid=9584&languagecode=12298
MrB said:There's a meeting today and 4:15pm http://senparlvu.parl.gc.ca/Guide.aspx?viewmode=4&categoryid=-1¤tdate=2014-06-18&eventid=9584&languagecode=12298
depends if the senate needs to discuss more. anyone listening to the session: did they mention moving to third hearing or motion to allocate more time? usually they mention it at the end of the session.sicko86 said:Guys do you know if there will be more Committee meetings for Bill C-24 or Yesterday's meeting was the only one? Are they going to the Report Stage or there will be additional meetings before that.
I saw other Bills with 3-4 meetings.
Goldline said:so when is the 3rd reading taking place? Also is the 3rd reading the last step before royal c..
chakrab said:depends if the senate needs to discuss more. anyone listening to the session: did they mention moving to third hearing or motion to allocate more time? usually they mention it at the end of the session.
sicko can u send me the link plzsicko86 said:There was an observation added .. Regarding the waive of fees for poor people .. thats all.
I watched it .. but I missed the last 10 minutes .. so I don't know if they will have more meetings. From what I saw I dont think so because NDP/Liberal Senate mentioned all the concerns: Intent to reside, Revocation without trial, Pre-PR time. the voting was 7/4 all the time so all the amendments were rejected. even the Conservatives couldn't justify the revocation without proper trial part.
there are no liberal senators any more.sicko86 said:There was an observation added .. Regarding the waive of fees for poor people .. thats all.
I watched it .. but I missed the last 10 minutes .. so I don't know if they will have more meetings. From what I saw I dont think so because NDP/Liberal Senate mentioned all the concerns: Intent to reside, Revocation without trial, Pre-PR time. the voting was 7/4 all the time so all the amendments were rejected. even the Conservatives couldn't justify the revocation without proper trial part.