you don't have to worry.polarbear said:Hello,
My application is currently in processing,
I what way this C-24 will affect the application if it gets Royal Assesment now,
I mean "4 years increase" and "intend to reside" clause.
![]()
It is unfair if they apply it on any permanent resident who entered Canada before the date this Bill is effective,but cons will do!!! they do not care about any principles or ethics. Newzealand gave a transition period before they apply a similar law. They should give choices to new immigrants if they would like to proceed with immigration with the new rules. They should not change any rule mid-streams on PRs,it is a crime and can be considered as fraudulent action by itself!!!!. At the entry for the first time in Canada at the airport the immigration officer explain to everyone what does the physical presence of 1095 before citizenship application mean. Now everything changes on you without any respect to previous information they gave.polarbear said:Hello,
My application is currently in processing,
I what way this C-24 will affect the application if it gets Royal Assesment now,
I mean "4 years increase" and "intend to reside" clause.
![]()
I read this and my understanding is that the residency related clause will not kick off right after Royal Assent. They will set a date. However which date is still a mystery.civic said:If you guys read careful the sections covering the coming into force date, we see that all transitional provisions will come into force upon Royal Assent. This might include new residency requirements. The coming into force for a later date after Royal Assent are also listed and it doesn't include residency-related clauses. My first guess was wrong. The moment Royal Assent is granted, the new law will kick off, except stated exemptions.
http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/LOP/LegislativeSummaries/41/2/c24-e.pdf
can you elaborate the meaning of this? So it went through CIMM and going back to HoC for third reading and votes?Tolerance said:Today the CIMM 'report' became available:
41st Parliament, 2nd Session
The Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration has the honour to present its
THIRD REPORT
In accordance with its Order of Reference of Thursday, May 29, 2014, your Committee has considered Bill C-24, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, and agreed on Tuesday, June 3, 2014, to report it without amendment.
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meeting Nos. 30 and 31) is tabled.
Respectfully submitted,
DAVID TILSON
Chair
Should we now shift our protest to Governor Council? Can s/he pick a random date for it or s/he has to listen to Harper?moe2014 said:ITS ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE LAW TO EFFECTIVE ON THE DAY OF ROYAL ASSENT . SO I THINK ALL THE LEG PULLERS SHOULD STEP BACK AND STOP COMMENTING SOMETHING ABOUT THAT IS NOT TRUE.
I HAVE DONE ALL MY RESEARCH AND HAVE SPOKEN TO MANY MP'S THAT INCLUDES CONSERVATIVE MP'S AS WELL.
REGARDLESS OF THE ROYAL ASSENT DATE . EFFECTIVE DATE WILL BE DETERMINED ONLY BY GOVERNOR COUNCIL .
YOU ALL HAVE MY WORD .... AND ITS CERTAIN THAT THIS BILL WONT GO THROUGH THE FINAL STAGES BEFORE SUMMER BREAK.
PLEASE RELAX AND ENJOY YOUR SUMMER..![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I'm no expert, but it should be that when the committee presents its report back to the House, the committee stage is done. That would mean third reading should soon appear in the HoC projected order of business.civic said:can you elaborate the meaning of this? So it went through CIMM and going back to HoC for third reading and votes?
Can you explain how members of committee are selected?!? What kind of democracy is this OMG. I am so upsetTolerance said:I'm no expert, but it should be that when the committee presents its report back to the House, the committee stage is done. That would mean third reading should soon appear in the HoC projected order of business.