It’s worth mentioning at the end of interview she said she believes our relationship was genuine but she is concerned it’s for the purpose of immigration benefits giving my previous history
Ok thanks for the information. I think the issue here is about immigration intent not how genuine maybe am wrong but it does say she does not believe I didn’t enter the relationship just for immigration benefits. Any information would be helpful we have 30 days to appeal so we don’t know our options if we appeal or just start new application maybe after a year or 8 months
These statements that you claim the officer made during hte interview are not really consistent with the refusal (IMO). Were you both together in the same room for the interview? And heard the same comment? This may be a matter of precise wording, not what you interpreted the officer meant.
When was the interview? Was this before your spouse's longer visit of several months? When did you submit the original application?
You don't specify but my hunch is that the start of your relationship (the first year etc before the five month stay) was thin. Did you meet online? How many times had you met and spent time together
before you submitted the application?
I also have no idea whether better to appeal or apply anew. Again my hunch is that the application was mostly evaluated on basis of the first (thinner) part of your relationship history, where it would be easier to conclude that you sought out the relationship for immigration purposes.
But I'm reading between the lines of the history that leaves out a lot. I don't rule out they had other information I don't know about.
You could consider ordering GCMS notes.