Sagar5187 said:
Hi Tuyan,
Thanks for your support.....
So if we put additional pics of ur getogether and all... they would acceept it in IAD. thats wht i wanna more info about.....
Cause we have daily phone calls and chats.... and that is a physical proof...
In appeal form we dont have much info to fill in..
SO where can we explain this in written to them....
Do you have any idea...
You need to read the IAD rules for spousal appeals. http://www.irb-cisr.gc.ca/eng/brdcom/references/legjur/Pages/SpoPar.aspx
If you are not comfortable with these rules or do not understand them, you REALLY need to find an attorney to assist you. If you cannot afford one, check with legal aid societies or immigrant assistance groups in your area.
You must submit copies of all this material to the tribunal (IAD) and the Minister's representative
in advance of the hearing. If you have phone calls and chat logs and pictures, you would submit copies of these things, along with any written arguments that you make.
You should order a copy of your case notes because the visa officer's concerns will be detailed in those notes. Make sure you address those concerns. Thus, the evidence you provide really must relate to those issues. Everything you presented to the VO is included, but you may supplement the record with additional information.
In order for a foreign national to be considered a spouse, common-law partner or conjugal
partner, the evidence must establish that the relationship in question, namely the marriage, the
common-law partnership or the conjugal partnership, is not a bad faith relationship. The burden
of establishing the bona fides of the marriage is on the appellant at the IAD129 but the evidence
should not be minutely scrutinized nor should North American reasoning necessarily be applied
to partners coming from another culture.130 Genuineness of a relationship should be examined
through the eyes of the parties themselves against the cultural background in which they have
lived.
http://www.irb-cisr.gc.ca/eng/brdcom/references/legjur/documents/SpoPar05_e.pdf
Key in this is what your intent was. For example, I suspect (but do not know because I have no insight into the VO's rationale):
A relationship that was entered into primarily for the purpose of acquiring any status or
privilege under the IRPA is one that was entered into in order to obtain permanent residence in
Canada or some other status or privilege. In the case of a marriage, the time at which the
relationship was entered into refers to the date of the marriage. In the case of a common-law
partnership, it refers to the date on which the partners began to cohabit in a conjugal relationship
and in the case of a conjugal partnership, it refers to the date on which the foreign national and
the sponsor began a conjugal relationship. While the focus of this branch of the test is the
intention of the partners at the time they entered into the relationship, the IAD is entitled to
examine the conduct of the couple after the relationship began in order to determine what their
intention was when they entered into the relationship.140 Only one of the partners in the
relationship need have as their primary purpose the acquisition of any status or privilege under
the Act.141 Finally, the appeal may be allowed if immigration is a factor in the relationship,
provided it is not the primary factor.
You would also be well-served to use CanLii to look at decisions in cases similar to yours. Read the decision. Try to look at why the failed applications are different than yours. Try to look at the successful appeals and figure out how the decision in their case can be applied to your case.
Since you have a genuine relationship, you need to demonstrate that to the tribunal. The tribunal (the "judge" hearing your case) doesn't know you, so you need to explain to her or him how your relationship is genuine. It is best if you base this upon examples that have previously been successful - you can cite to those other cases and point them out as part of your explanation.
Hopefully this explains a bit more about the process - and why it's a
very good idea to have an experienced advocate representing your interest.