Ponga said:It should be instantaneous, since everything is scanned by CIC when the application is initially received.
oh really?? I thought CIC mailed them to the VO thats why I asked. thats great
Ponga said:It should be instantaneous, since everything is scanned by CIC when the application is initially received.
Well, that's why I said `should', because I'm not 100% certain for an Outland application.alb01 said:oh really?? I thought CIC mailed them to the VO thats why I asked. thats great
To clarify, once a couple has established common-law status, they can be apart for however long they need to be provided they are able to prove that the relationship is continuing.Aquakitty said:Two weeks is ok, you are permitted short trips while still maintaining common-law status.
The general consensus is, a trip of up to a few weeks is acceptable. If it's over a month, you are going to need a very good reason for leaving without your spouse.
The person that Aquakitty was replying to [willyblue] will likely have Condition: 51, so the rules are different regarding extended periods apart.canuck_in_uk said:To clarify, once a couple has established common-law status, they can be apart for however long they need to be provided they are able to prove that the relationship is continuing.
There have been many couples who became common-law here in Canada and then the foreign spouse returned to their country while the app processed. There was one couple who lived apart for 3 years after becoming common-law; they had an interview because it was such a long time but were approved without issue when they showed proof of the ongoing relationship.
Yea good point, I was reading it as if they were still acquiring common-law status. So that's the case until the partner lands at any rate.canuck_in_uk said:To clarify, once a couple has established common-law status, they can be apart for however long they need to be provided they are able to prove that the relationship is continuing.
There have been many couples who became common-law here in Canada and then the foreign spouse returned to their country while the app processed. There was one couple who lived apart for 3 years after becoming common-law; they had an interview because it was such a long time but were approved without issue when they showed proof of the ongoing relationship.
If you don't have kids together, or haven't been in a common-law relationship for 2 years or more, then you will have Condition 51 status. Then what I said applies again, after you land. This is called "conditional permanent residence" and it lasts for 2 years from the date you land.willyblue said:[thank @Aquakitty... Just to add a few point...We have completed our common law in London..While leaving together in London my partner travel to Canada for 2weeks for Christmas but returned 10days later...She's finally back to Canada and she has a job there already.
Ponga said something about condition (51)...Pls could u throw more light on what it says.. Many thanks
Ponga said:The person that Aquakitty was replying to [willyblue] will likely have Condition: 51, so the rules are different regarding extended periods apart.
From his post, willyblue was referring to travelling WHILE applying, not after, so Condition 51 has nothing to do with the answer.willyblue said:Hello all...I just read a post and I'm really worried right now...if u are applying common law and ur partner travels to see her family for 2weeks..Will that affect ur common law status?
You are right . The application is scanned but after scanning,the entire doc and pics included in the application is all mailed to the VO. It takes about a week to arrive VO, but add about one or two days for VO to go thru the file and acknowledge receipt . At this point, eCas goes to "In Process"Ponga said:Well, that's why I said `should', because I'm not 100% certain for an Outland application.
Since the initial receipt/coding is the same for Outland/Inland, it would make sense that the electronic file would be instantly accessible by the foreign VO, but...
Certainly not the first time I've deduced incorrectly.canuck_in_uk said:From his post, willyblue was referring to travelling WHILE applying, not after, so Condition 51 has nothing to do with the answer.
Take a wine break, I find it helps tremendously .Ponga said:Certainly not the first time I've deduced incorrectly.
MrScarface said:Hey guys, we recently got our AOR but we sent in the application without being in possession of our marriage certificate. Does anyone have experience or advice on whether we should send in the marriage certificate with the case number as reference now already or should we wait until they request it?