computergeek
VIP Member
- Jan 31, 2012
- 278
- 124
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- CPP-O/LA
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 06-03-2012
- AOR Received.
- 21-06-2012
- File Transfer...
- 21-6-2012
- Med's Done....
- 11-02-2012
- Interview........
- Waived
- Passport Req..
- 26-09-2012
- VISA ISSUED...
- 10-10-2012
- LANDED..........
- 13-10-2012
This runs counter to their published policy. From OP 1 "Procedures" Section 5.19 ("File Transfers"):Mela said:Another cheery conversation with CIC this morning. Just to refresh:
File received by CIC March 6, 2013 (14 months now)
File transferred to Winnipeg Jan 29, 2014
So I called to see if I could hear anything about how our file is doing in the Winnipeg office. I found out that since our address had been changed to Saskatoon they held our file in Winnipeg for almost 3 months and then transferred it to Saskatoon so now we're at the bottom of the pile there and it could take up to 8 months just to get our first step approval. That would make our first step approval a 21 month process. Meanwhile living on one salary for so long is just putting our lives completely on hold and I'm starting to go a little crazy because we never receive any news unless I call and when I call all I get is disappointing news. Happy Monday! lol.
Thus, it is improper to place your file "at the bottom of the pile" when it is transferred. It DOES seem common, but it really is contrary to their own published rules.For assessment purposes, visa offices receiving a transferred file must respect the original date on which the application was received as the “lock-in” date. For processing purposes, all processing steps for the files transferred to an office, including the scheduling of interviews, should be the same as for all other applications received in the office on the date corresponding to the “lock-in” date of the received file. This means that an application that is received in Paris in July 2002 and transferred to New Delhi in March 2003, would enter the New Delhi queue as of July 2002.
Have you ordered a copy of your electronic case notes? If not, I'd strongly suggest that you do so. That will tell you WHY it was referred to a local office.