CHC, Islamabad Spouse Sponsorship Timeline 2009 -2010

[saggit_16]

Really Brave of you man! Thats like real leader!
We are with you. InshaALLAH it would be helpful for all the victims... Way to go man! you rock

Salam All,

Thank you Every one for the feed Back

Soo..

I went to see my lawyer today and I had to take a Decision wither I continue or Just settle it..

I was Very Scared and nervous And completely Lost while i was at the lawyers Office... My Lawyer Popped the question to what I want to do....

I Looked at my wife And she Lifted her head up suddenly and She Said "Fight it with No fear don't let pressure over take you I'm with you".. At that point on I was thinking of everyone in this Forum. So I made My decision......Allah Knows Better for the rest

I rejected the Settlement with no counter offer sticking with my story..

Thanks for the boost of Confidence and the Strength you ALL GAVE ME.
Specially Brother Danny, Khan82, wes786, humpakwatan , Pakivette, lonly widout hubby, muzmil, Khilafah5, anzee.

I will Keep you all Posted now its another wait game till my Lawyer gets new Update

Happy Ramadan All.

 

[bestplace4u]

Really Brave of you man! Thats like real leader!
We are with you. InshaALLAH it would be helpful for all the victims... Way to go man! you rock

Sorry i was not visiting the thread so no idea what is he about to do can any one tell me?

 

[wes786]

Sorry i was not visiting the thread so no idea what is he about to do can any one tell me?

Him and his lawyer has filed a lawsuit against CHC-Islamabad. Immigration officer working on his wife's file sold whole bunch of VISA's to other people and then left the embassy. His wife's VISA was sold to someone else and the person even landed in Toronto while she was waiting in Karachi to receive correspondence from Islamabad and were waiting to get their process done so yeah she was one of the victoms of this fraud!

 

[tweety44]

aj bhi koi request nahi ayii........

 

[bestplace4u]

Him and his lawyer has filed a lawsuit against CHC-Islamabad. Immigration officer working on his wife's file sold whole bunch of VISA's to other people and then left the embassy. His wife's VISA was sold to someone else and the person even landed in Toronto while she was waiting in Karachi to receive correspondence from Islamabad and were waiting to get their process done so yeah she was one of the victoms of this fraud!

hm

 

[ainy inam]

I MAILD TO ISLAMABAD BUT NO REPLY..................... :'(

 

[Pagalboy]

So your wife got the visa when she was called to the embassy in Islamabad correct? Is she with you in Canada or you are dealing with this issue while in Pakistan?

Hey bro ,

Wife she's here with me in Canada, thank God I have the support of Quebec immigration and the human right and privacy act group supporting my case.

My lawyer was laughing at the request of settlement move by CIC and CHC ISB case is on mh Favor that's what he said..

Main thing lawyers in Quebec wants to push first is the audit team that was scheduled in CHC ISB was cancelled for no gaven reason.

to get the case going is to have an audit in ISB.

To surprise you all the standard rule of operation by an ambassy like CHC-ISB are in violation due to the following:

First step when the medical is received it's followed by a internal criminal check in Pakistan and then background Check by CSIS. So the standard rule of operation is violated by lieing to the applicants the a re-pcc is needed to under-go background check when that step is already completed within the first 6 months of AOR. Under regulation of the CSIS I background check upon completion is valid for 1 year a re-pcc is required one more time to check internal criminal check update followed again by remedial then visa.

Under CSIS Protocol and security After an ambassy received Medical background check should follow emmidiatly not after a re-pcc it is a violation of security protocol and a potential national treat.

So why are they saying after re-pcc the file under-going background check when that step was already completed with the first 6 months.

So if the CSIS completed the protocol step the first 6 months why is CHC-ISB not logging it immediately why are they waiting for a re-pcc.

Anyways these are from Quebec immigration requesting audit to ISB.

since skilled worker was transferred to london why did ISB cut down on Processing.

With the bad history of one of the worst ambassador MR Hynes Currently running CHC-ISB was a total desaster in Kenya creating a timeline of nearly 32 months if he failed so miserably why was he transferred to a high processing that is ISB.

MR Hynes failed to follow Canadian Immigration standard operation rules and failed to adequately and professionally train workers to meet the requirement by Canadian immigration rules.

It believe so by Quebec immigration the lack of skill and untrained worker that created a huge backlog into the spousal system.

So this is the first step is to audit the ambassy then rest will follow along my case.

Sorry for the typing errors and this is for those who PM to know what steps are being conducted

 

[zeeeee]

Oh my GOD!!

CHC is violating like a dozen rules & regulations!! No wonder the time-line for Pakistan sucks!!

You've taken a great step Pgalboy! I just hope & pray that it benefits the cause!!

Jazakallah!!

Hey bro ,

Wife she's here with me in Canada, thank God I have the support of Quebec immigration and the human right and privacy act group supporting my case.

My lawyer was laughing at the request of settlement move by CIC and CHC ISB case is on mh Favor that's what he said..

Main thing lawyers in Quebec wants to push first is the audit team that was scheduled in CHC ISB was cancelled for no gaven reason.

to get the case going is to have an audit in ISB.

To surprise you all the standard rule of operation by an ambassy like CHC-ISB are in violation due to the following:

First step when the medical is received it's followed by a internal criminal check in Pakistan and then background Check by CSIS. So the standard rule of operation is violated by lieing to the applicants the a re-pcc is needed to under-go background check when that step is already completed within the first 6 months of AOR. Under regulation of the CSIS I background check upon completion is valid for 1 year a re-pcc is required one more time to check internal criminal check update followed again by remedial then visa.

Under CSIS Protocol and security After an ambassy received Medical background check should follow emmidiatly not after a re-pcc it is a violation of security protocol and a potential national treat.

So why are they saying after re-pcc the file under-going background check when that step was already completed with the first 6 months.

So if the CSIS completed the protocol step the first 6 months why is CHC-ISB not logging it immediately why are they waiting for a re-pcc.

Anyways these are from Quebec immigration requesting audit to ISB.

since skilled worker was transferred to london why did ISB cut down on Processing.

With the bad history of one of the worst ambassador MR Hynes Currently running CHC-ISB was a total desaster in Kenya creating a timeline of nearly 32 months if he failed so miserably why was he transferred to a high processing that is ISB.

MR Hynes failed to follow Canadian Immigration standard operation rules and failed to adequately and professionally train workers to meet the requirement by Canadian immigration rules.

It believe so by Quebec immigration the lack of skill and untrained worker that created a huge backlog into the spousal system.

So this is the first step is to audit the ambassy then rest will follow along my case.

Sorry for the typing errors and this is for those who PM to know what steps are being conducted

 

[wes786]

Great info for the applicants that are currently in process. I have served my 19 months being in this torture already and now just waiting for my wife's VISA to be stamped. I am glad its almost over for me, but I hope the steps you are taking will benifit others in the near future InshAllah if everything rolls smoothly. You have done great for the community and I really hope it works out at the end for you and hopefully the timeline is reduced back to 6 months like it was back in 2007-08 InshAllah.

Hey bro ,

Wife she's here with me in Canada, thank God I have the support of Quebec immigration and the human right and privacy act group supporting my case.

My lawyer was laughing at the request of settlement move by CIC and CHC ISB case is on mh Favor that's what he said..

Main thing lawyers in Quebec wants to push first is the audit team that was scheduled in CHC ISB was cancelled for no gaven reason.

to get the case going is to have an audit in ISB.

To surprise you all the standard rule of operation by an ambassy like CHC-ISB are in violation due to the following:

First step when the medical is received it's followed by a internal criminal check in Pakistan and then background Check by CSIS. So the standard rule of operation is violated by lieing to the applicants the a re-pcc is needed to under-go background check when that step is already completed within the first 6 months of AOR. Under regulation of the CSIS I background check upon completion is valid for 1 year a re-pcc is required one more time to check internal criminal check update followed again by remedial then visa.

Under CSIS Protocol and security After an ambassy received Medical background check should follow emmidiatly not after a re-pcc it is a violation of security protocol and a potential national treat.

So why are they saying after re-pcc the file under-going background check when that step was already completed with the first 6 months.

So if the CSIS completed the protocol step the first 6 months why is CHC-ISB not logging it immediately why are they waiting for a re-pcc.

Anyways these are from Quebec immigration requesting audit to ISB.

since skilled worker was transferred to london why did ISB cut down on Processing.

With the bad history of one of the worst ambassador MR Hynes Currently running CHC-ISB was a total desaster in Kenya creating a timeline of nearly 32 months if he failed so miserably why was he transferred to a high processing that is ISB.

MR Hynes failed to follow Canadian Immigration standard operation rules and failed to adequately and professionally train workers to meet the requirement by Canadian immigration rules.

It believe so by Quebec immigration the lack of skill and untrained worker that created a huge backlog into the spousal system.

So this is the first step is to audit the ambassy then rest will follow along my case.

Sorry for the typing errors and this is for those who PM to know what steps are being conducted

 

[mfawad]

HEY...we all are with you in this ...what happen to you wasnt fair and thank you for standing against it n fighting it so no one else face this fraud

Salam All,

Thank you Every one for the feed Back

Soo..

I went to see my lawyer today and I had to take a Decision wither I continue or Just settle it..

I was Very Scared and nervous And completely Lost while i was at the lawyers Office... My Lawyer Popped the question to what I want to do....

I Looked at my wife And she Lifted her head up suddenly and She Said "Fight it with No fear don't let pressure over take you I'm with you".. At that point on I was thinking of everyone in this Forum. So I made My decision......Allah Knows Better for the rest

I rejected the Settlement with no counter offer sticking with my story..

Thanks for the boost of Confidence and the Strength you ALL GAVE ME.
Specially Brother Danny, Khan82, wes786, humpakwatan , Pakivette, lonly widout hubby, muzmil, Khilafah5, anzee.

I will Keep you all Posted now its another wait game till my Lawyer gets new Update

Happy Ramadan All.

 

[Tor-wi]

I got a reply today from CIC

This is in response to your email (see below).

Your application is currently in process and is in queue for review by an immigration officer. Currently, background checks are underway for this application.

We thank you for your patience and for keeping your correspondence to a minimum.



I guess may be couple more months from here? he is a Pakistani citizen working overseas right now and he has only been to these two countries..crossing fingers x

 

[Tor-wi]

Him and his lawyer has filed a lawsuit against CHC-Islamabad. Immigration officer working on his wife's file sold whole bunch of VISA's to other people and then left the embassy. His wife's VISA was sold to someone else and the person even landed in Toronto while she was waiting in Karachi to receive correspondence from Islamabad and were waiting to get their process done so yeah she was one of the victoms of this fraud!

Ohh my God...seriously? this is disgusting... ???

 

[R.Mujgani]

https://dmp-portal.cic.gc.ca/cicemail/intro-eng.aspx?mission=islamabad
um this is a site i got from the immigration site
do u think its wise to add or change inquiries in ur case on this site....

can u guys explain wat the heck is this site? first time seein it and look in at
it so im not sure..... wat to think of this.

 

[humpakwatan]

Hey bro ,

Wife she's here with me in Canada, thank God I have the support of Quebec immigration and the human right and privacy act group supporting my case.

My lawyer was laughing at the request of settlement move by CIC and CHC ISB case is on mh Favor that's what he said..

Main thing lawyers in Quebec wants to push first is the audit team that was scheduled in CHC ISB was cancelled for no gaven reason.

to get the case going is to have an audit in ISB.

To surprise you all the standard rule of operation by an ambassy like CHC-ISB are in violation due to the following:

First step when the medical is received it's followed by a internal criminal check in Pakistan and then background Check by CSIS. So the standard rule of operation is violated by lieing to the applicants the a re-pcc is needed to under-go background check when that step is already completed within the first 6 months of AOR. Under regulation of the CSIS I background check upon completion is valid for 1 year a re-pcc is required one more time to check internal criminal check update followed again by remedial then visa.

Under CSIS Protocol and security After an ambassy received Medical background check should follow emmidiatly not after a re-pcc it is a violation of security protocol and a potential national treat.

So why are they saying after re-pcc the file under-going background check when that step was already completed with the first 6 months.

So if the CSIS completed the protocol step the first 6 months why is CHC-ISB not logging it immediately why are they waiting for a re-pcc.

Anyways these are from Quebec immigration requesting audit to ISB.

since skilled worker was transferred to london why did ISB cut down on Processing.

With the bad history of one of the worst ambassador MR Hynes Currently running CHC-ISB was a total desaster in Kenya creating a timeline of nearly 32 months if he failed so miserably why was he transferred to a high processing that is ISB.

MR Hynes failed to follow Canadian Immigration standard operation rules and failed to adequately and professionally train workers to meet the requirement by Canadian immigration rules.

It believe so by Quebec immigration the lack of skill and untrained worker that created a huge backlog into the spousal system.

So this is the first step is to audit the ambassy then rest will follow along my case.

Sorry for the typing errors and this is for those who PM to know what steps are being conducted

Wow I was just talking to my friend earlier yesterday over email about how most of the workload has been shifted to London Embassy for skilled workers etc and just mostly spousal and some Afghanistan cases only are being processed at Islamabad embassy so why is it still taking such a long time and how we need to push for a audit there!

Please keep us posted! We are praying for you to win this case and get an audit for Islamabad! That takes a lot of courage to fight the temptation to settle! So I want to thank you for going forward with it! May Allah help you with this fight.

 

[DodgeCharger]

https://dmp-portal.cic.gc.ca/cicemail/intro-eng.aspx?mission=islamabad
um this is a site i got from the immigration site
do u think its wise to add or change inquiries in ur case on this site....

can u guys explain wat the heck is this site? first time seein it and look in at
it so im not sure..... wat to think of this.

i tried this in the beginning but it didnt work for me, then i emailed them from my email address and that worked. I think this is just a stupid fancy page, a waste of taxpayers money.