announcements seem good but when they release details everything falls apartAlexios07 said:B) Good, but need more info to become better.
announcements seem good but when they release details everything falls apartAlexios07 said:B) Good, but need more info to become better.
Incorrect calculation, buddy.kashish948 said:This looks like some good news and the points should go down considerably before even year end.
Total invitaions since June 1, 2016 = 10,903
Target for 20176(ITAs till June 2017) = 73,700 (Only Federal Economic Class)
Remaining ITAs for 7 months = 62797
ITAs per month = 8,971
Suppose they continue with 2 draws a month, ITAs per draw = 4485 and thats a huge number!!!
Even if they take 3500 ITAs per draw, the score should drop below 450 easily.
actually annual IRCC report is never an announcement in policy details and only in general immigration targets.Innana said:Very bare-bone announcement. Nothing has been mentioned in details. Disappointing and that's an understatement.
Well the OP was facts...betty44 said:More data !!!! this looks like a game!!. People want changes in EE. Facts no more data and speculation!!
What is the pilot scheme btw?Aal_ said:I don't see why do we need more data. IF you are under federal skilled, fsw or cec, the quota increased 26% (ok u want to remove the 2000 pilot program go ahead)
I fail to see how this can be bad or worse than 2015 or 2016. it increased implies better.
Considering the PR admissions 2011-2015, the projected increase for the years 2016 and 2017 is fairly high, and a good enough reason to be happy.kryt0n said:You guys all seem fairly bleak about the whole thing
You. I like you.Que Em said:Considering the PR admissions 2011-2015, the projected increase for the years 2016 and 2017 is fairly high, and a good enough reason to be happy.
Que Em said:Considering the PR admissions 2011-2015, the projected increase for the years 2016 and 2017 is fairly high, and a good enough reason to be happy.
Same stats, but the original graph is an exaggerated one used for marketing purposes or buzzfeed's articles while mf4361's graph is how you should properly draw a graph.kryt0n said:Thats the same graph, just using a different starting y point.