jsm0085 said:
Yes. God forbid anyone would fight for the integrity of Canadian legislation and ultimately for what is right. She is ensuring that all future Canadians are protected. You obviously haven't devoted anytime to understanding what could happen without this amendment.
The amendment in no way risks the bill. If you watched or followed any of the committee discussions or testimony, you'd know this is needed.
Stop being so selfish guys.
"You obviously haven't devoted any time to understanding..." EXCUSE ME???
I've been following this Bill every single day for a year. How dare you!
Plus, you are the one being selfish by thinking your agenda is the only correct agenda.
I gave my opinion, that's it, it's not being selfish.
Correct me if I'm wrong, you're already a Citizen, eh? So you don't care about delays or applying soon, you just care about your citizenship's protection.
So please, tell me again, who is being selfish here?
Me, under previous-C24 terms, I would've applied for Citizenship in June 2016.
I badly need my Citizenship for different personal reasons.
So do many others.
I'm not saying she doesn't have a point. But why couldn't have she done her own S- Bill later?
By putting an agenda on the table, it's more risk of the Bill being rejected and at the very least, delayed.
This is my opinion, you're free not like it but I won't allow anyone here to call me selfish or any other pejorative descriptive.