Im zeroing in on something here, and i may be wrong. Just my opinion.
The refusal says that "...the duties listed on your confirmation of employment do not correspond to the
lead statement of NOC.."
from http://www30.hrsdc.gc.ca/NOC/english/NOC/2006/Tutorial.aspx "....
The lead statement provides a general description of the occupation and the boundaries of the unit group. It also indicates the kinds of industries, workplaces or establishments where the occupation is found.. Therefore, this is the statement you see just before the individual job responsibilities are listed. According to OB 521 http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/manuals/bulletins/2013/ob521.asp, "...the applicant will need to demonstrate that they
performed the actions in the lead statement,
and performed a substantial number of the main duties, including all the essential duties, of the occupation as set out in the occupational description...".
It sounds like it is not enough just to have the duties match the ones listed on HRSDC, but your job should somehow also fit into the lead statement. So for the sake of example, lets take a lead statement from NOC 4122, :" Post-secondary teaching and research assistants assist university professors, community college and CEGEP teachers and other faculty members in teaching and research activities at universities and colleges"...
lets say you submit a letter that matches the duties in that NOC but you claim to be a teaching assistant at an
elementary school. This may create an anomaly because the lead statement states that people in this NOC are employed at Universities, Community Colleges, Cegeps etc..." . Therefore "red flags" come up, because teaching assistants are not usually employed at Elementary Schools. This may be a terrible example but i hope i am able to illustrate the point i am trying to make
It is just my opinion, and i am not saying i am correct, that perhaps something similar in your job description did not jive with the lead statement of your NOC
grilled said:
Got a refusal today...heart broken ...almost 5 years of my life wasted.....worked my ass off..paid taxes and in the end some dumb visa officer not satisfied...... Believe me all the job duties mentioned in my letter were accordance with NOC code....Worked hard at my job...got a raise.....here is copy of the letter i got .........How can he or she be so dumb....
Dear xxxxxxxxxxxx:
I have now completed the assessment of your application for a permanent resident visa as a member of the Canadian Experience Class (CEC) and have determined that you do not meet the requirements for immigration to Canada.
According to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, applicants in the Canadian Experience Class are assessed on the basis of the pass/fail requirements set out in subsection R87.1(2). The assessment of these criteria determines whether a worker with Canadian experience will be able to become economically established in Canada. The criteria are:
knowledge of English or French,
Canadian skilled work experience,
Canadian educational credentials (for the Post-Graduation Stream only).
Your application was assessed based on the occupation(s) which you identified as part of your skilled work experience in Canada
I am not satisfied that you meet the skilled work experience requirement because the duties listed on your confirmation of employment do not correspond to the lead statement of NOC . For this reason, I am not satisfied you acquired the necessary work experience under this NOC codes to qualify under stream of the CEC.
Subsection 11(1) of the Act states that a foreign national must, before entering Canada, apply to an officer for a visa or for any other document required by the Regulations. The visa or document shall be issued if, following an examination, the officer is satisfied that the foreign national is not inadmissible and meets the requirements of this Act. Subsection 2(1) specifies that unless otherwise indicated, references in the Act to “this Act” include regulations made under it.
Following an examination of your application, I am not satisfied that you meet the requirements of the Act and Regulations for the reasons explained above. I am therefore refusing your application.
Thank you for the interest you have shown in Canada.
Yours sincerely,
Case Officer
Citizenship and Immigration Canada