physiocraze said:Hai Cam
Yes, it is entirely different from my 2005 application file number.
[/quote
be happy....congrats....u r in q.....next pitstop...ur VO
physiocraze said:Hai Cam
Yes, it is entirely different from my 2005 application file number.
[/quote
be happy....congrats....u r in q.....next pitstop...ur VO
I think congratulations are in order then! Hopefully we will all hear about our numbers through emails we will receive in November... that is when I had expected the first AOR's to surface anyway.physiocraze said:Hai Cam
Yes, it is entirely different from my 2005 application file number.
Well certainly I'd like to believe that, I guess November is a telling month. If we get to the end of November with no AORs then we can be pretty sure they are deliberately delaying them.Cam1234 said:I think congratulations are in order then! Hopefully we will all hear about our numbers through emails we will receive in November... that is when I had expected the first AOR's to surface anyway.
If we don't receive any AORs in November, then I will start to worry about the 33 weeks. In general though, Minister Kenney says in his speech, on June 26, that these new measures are being placed because we would like to eliminate the potential of a future backlog and make processing times shorter.
33 weeks will create a new backlog and would show the new policies enacted have failed only four months after they were implemented. What a embarrassment that would be for the current administration. I am quite certain 33 weeks is the time WITHIN WHICH we should all expect to hear something, and AORs in November would prove that.
Good luck to all,
Cam
CONGRATS to all for client id thing..and now hopefully very soon, v may hear a flood of AOR's.!!!physiocraze said:Hai Cam
Yes, it is entirely different from my 2005 application file number.
Then don't give up man! I see that you are in 1122, can you or your wife qualify under another NOC?? Take a good look at the NOCs one more time... I know what a pain it must be to take that exam again, but just imagine how happy you would be once you succeed and move to Canada.berry said:I had such high hopes cause I live in a really horrible country this was my one hope.
Great idea, when the application was originally sent the IELTS was valid. If the application would have been received by Berry he may have had the time to re-submit with a valid IELTS, but the application never arrived and now the IELTS have expired. I think your letter is a very good idea. Berry what do you have to lose, maybe by resubmitting with this letter they will accept it. Sit down think about everything and make your own decision.Pippin said:Berry: Don't give up because of IELTS. Get it done and send it in. What do seniors think....could the package be sent with the IELTS score on hand and evidence that the next exam will be done on .....date and original will be forwarded to CIO? A letter explaining that your package was lost after leaving CIO to explain WHY your original IELTS has not been included at the outset. Would it work?
Pippin said:Berry: Don't give up because of IELTS. Get it done and send it in. What do seniors think....could the package be sent with the IELTS score on hand and evidence that the next exam will be done on .....date and original will be forwarded to CIO? A letter explaining that your package was lost after leaving CIO to explain WHY your original IELTS has not been included at the outset. Would it work? I am not sure as I type which NOC you are in, but if it is one with low numbers it might be safer to wait until you have the new results....DON'T GIVE UP and regret it later. Good Luck
Thanks Cam thats very encouraging.Your right I dont really have much to loose.I appriciate the advice.Cam1234 said:Great idea, when the application was originally sent the IELTS was valid. If the application would have been received by Berry he may have had the time to re-submit with a valid IELTS, but the application never arrived and now the IELTS have expired. I think your letter is a very good idea. Berry what do you have to lose, maybe by resubmitting with this letter they will accept it. Sit down think about everything and make your own decision.
I can tell you from personal experience that the immigration officers are "human" and care... this is a very sad thing that has happened to you.
Cam
In my opinion the 33 weeks is the average for the whole process, in my undestanding CIC changed the process to complete it in one year to avoid raising applications from one year to another (June to June), in other words CIC is trying to close any application no more than a year.Moori said:Dear all,
A friend of mine in canada called cic and here are what is mentioned and i hope that you dont all get disappointed.
The current process is like that, first is the intial review of the application once it is recieved which takes 2 months now. After the intial review, an application is either incomplete and will be returned or it is complete and then comes the next step which is the assessment step taking according to current situation around 33 weeks on average. It could be more or it could be less according to the load they are having. Applications will be handled according to the que they are having. After the assessment step, they will send an email to those who included their email in their applications telling them about their status and what is next.
Regarding rejected packages, it may take a month or two to be returned back to the applicant's address. Remmember that larger packages will take longer time to get back.
I hope current times change and that faster steps are taken with the newest ministrial instructions as long as it has limited number of applicants and as long as complete documents have been sent. That is how i think and hope too