Cur-Rozen
Hero Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 28
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- Bucharest
- NOC Code......
- 1122
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- Sept 20,2010
- AOR Received.
- Jan 13, 2011
- IELTS Request
- attached (L7.5 R9 W6.5 S6.5, BS7.5)
- File Transfer...
- 2AOR - 8.03.2011
- Med's Request
- 5.04.2011
- Med's Done....
- 03.05.2011
- Passport Req..
- 14.09.2011
- VISA ISSUED...
- 28.09.2011
- LANDED..........
- 05.02.2012
About letter draft
We are not their clients! We are people, looking for another country to be our home. We are asking them to accept us, provide us social security, share their values and achievements. Please, refrain from stating they own us something. We have to be thankful for any opportunity they give us!!!
So, I propose to emphases on how they can facilitate the process for benefit of both sides!
1. Short communications on web will reduce calls and working people/hours. Economic benefit is always considered.
2. To clarify process of issuing AORs and return policy of non-eligible applications.
3. Including small "return package" fee in order not to lose important papers.
4. Warn them about our concern of possible Identity Stealings!!! This one should definitely work.
5. 33 weeks - no information on site, but Call Centre workers promote this timing that is much longer than before.
6. Will they change the NOC list in the light of almost finished 1122 NOC?
7. What will be the destiny of those applications that will be caught between completeness and eligibility test when CAP on that particular NOC will be full?
8. If CAP for a particular NOC will be full, but at the VO stage some applicants will withdraw their applications or will be considered non-eligible under medical or background check, will this re-open door for this NOC applications? Which applications will be considered to replace them?
Please, do start the letter with gratefull word about their good willing to accept us and that we are writing this letter only because we see the process from the other side, that can be in shadow for dicision makers. And our only will is to help the process to be transparent and painless for both sides.
To all the good people, who does not agree with my position. Just imagine for one minute, a stranger is knocking your door asking for a phone ring or maybe some food. And then he is starting to argue that your phone is working bad or your food is tasting bad and asking for something better. For how long will you let this person to argue in your house?
We are not their clients! We are people, looking for another country to be our home. We are asking them to accept us, provide us social security, share their values and achievements. Please, refrain from stating they own us something. We have to be thankful for any opportunity they give us!!!
So, I propose to emphases on how they can facilitate the process for benefit of both sides!
1. Short communications on web will reduce calls and working people/hours. Economic benefit is always considered.
2. To clarify process of issuing AORs and return policy of non-eligible applications.
3. Including small "return package" fee in order not to lose important papers.
4. Warn them about our concern of possible Identity Stealings!!! This one should definitely work.
5. 33 weeks - no information on site, but Call Centre workers promote this timing that is much longer than before.
6. Will they change the NOC list in the light of almost finished 1122 NOC?
7. What will be the destiny of those applications that will be caught between completeness and eligibility test when CAP on that particular NOC will be full?
8. If CAP for a particular NOC will be full, but at the VO stage some applicants will withdraw their applications or will be considered non-eligible under medical or background check, will this re-open door for this NOC applications? Which applications will be considered to replace them?
Please, do start the letter with gratefull word about their good willing to accept us and that we are writing this letter only because we see the process from the other side, that can be in shadow for dicision makers. And our only will is to help the process to be transparent and painless for both sides.
To all the good people, who does not agree with my position. Just imagine for one minute, a stranger is knocking your door asking for a phone ring or maybe some food. And then he is starting to argue that your phone is working bad or your food is tasting bad and asking for something better. For how long will you let this person to argue in your house?