yooper said:
Exactly. While its possible that anyone might end up being an outlier, the typical time is better if you ignore the applicants with very short or very long results. They probably were either helped by someone, or had some unusual situation. Me, I think I'm pretty typical -- spousal application with no issues (known to me at least).
And it looked to me a while ago as if the 'typical' processing time is somewhere in the 5-6 month area.
That is a big conclusion to jump to about being helped (faster timeline) or unusual situation (longer timeline.) My total time line from CPC-M receiving it (March 23), Transfer to Buffalo (May 5th), First PPR was June 30th. Somewhere between May 5th and June 30th it was transferred and processed in Los Angeles. Just because you hire or get someone to help you does not guarantee a faster process, and it is clearly stated that it will NOT help your file process any faster.
There are many people here who have been waiting for a long time for their applications that were "typical spousal applications" and have waited for over a year for processing.
One thing you will learn going thru this process is there is nothing "normal" or "typical" about ANY application....a lot depends on the quantity of applications received, some issues arose around the time they switched to the GCMS system, holidays may play a factor as well, we did see a big increase in processing times in Mississauga and Buffalo over the summer, and who the visa officer is who is processing your application....
As much as we all think our applications are typical, there could be the smallest issue like not paying the RPRF up froth that you may not think could hold it up, but that will hold things up for 2-3 months at least...
Sorry, I just get frustrated with assumptions about the time lines, and "typical" being used. EVERY application is different, and therefore as hard as it is, we can not compare our time lines to any one else's going through this process...