B
This kind of along the lines of what my husband thinks. He thinks that most people would not take kindly to their relationship being challenged and intimate details being exposed and would stand up to defend their relationship and their privacy. And that this is the response the officers expect to see in a legitimate relationship.boyee6576 said:Do you dare to say hey thats not really your business and lose your chance for a visa? or is that what they are hoping for. You to say something in defence of your relationship?
Yup, give ignorant people (theyre the same in all & every country) a teeeny, tiny bit of power and they will abuse it to the fullest possible.boyee6576 said:My husband got asked when we had sex, when was the first time, where we were located which city that is and then where in the house was it what you expected.My husband is Indian and you DONT talk about sex with another woman unless she is your wife. My husband was horrified but answered feeling very humiliated. I think she liked having that ability, being indian herself she had to know how she would have made my husband feel. He was not expecting anything like that but was afraid to not answer or tell her its not her business cause she holds our future in her hands. What do you do? Do you dare to say hey thats not really your business and lose your chance for a visa? or is that what they are hoping for. You to say something in defence of your relationship? Its crazy.
Yeah, I needed counselling after the interview.Siouxie said:There is guidance as to how CIC interviews should be conducted.
You can find it here http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/manuals/op/op01-eng.pdf section 11
11. Procedure: Conducting interviews
Officers conduct interviews:
• to give counselling;
Then fly into a rage and throw the applicant's marriage certificate and wedding photos on the floor.Establish rapport
• Greet the applicant.
• Put the client at ease
Explain the purpose and format of the interview
• Explain the officer's role and authority.
• Explain how the interview will be conducted.
Oh I don't believe they're lying. I think these things can happen, but it's rare. There are far more standard interviews than non-standard. Many good immigration officers are out there! I think people are just sharing a few bad experiences to get a feel for what's out there. There are bad apples everywhere.joecreosta said:stop this nonesense. immigration officers NEVER aske this kind of questions with this details.
so everyone typing their stories is all lies and BS.
im sure if some IO asked this question. then they would had been reported or complained about.nyssa said:Oh I don't believe they're lying. I think these things can happen, but it's rare. There are far more standard interviews than non-standard. Many good immigration officers are out there! I think people are just sharing a few bad experiences to get a feel for what's out there. There are bad apples everywhere.
i honesly dont know why ur worried about these questions. they wont ask u these. noone has ever been asked this qeustions. if they did. it wasnt to same as people saying it is.nncs said:It would be really nice if we can keep positive in this thread!
I only started it because I knew a possibility of such questions happen and I'm sure others are curious for it too!!!
Having read a lot of canadianwomens posts, I really do feel that if she says she was asked these questions, then she is telling the truth.joecreosta said:i honesly dont know why ur worried about these questions. they wont ask u these. noone has ever been asked this qeustions. if they did. it wasnt to same as people saying it is.
This case was a humdinger, by the way. They had doctored photographs from their wedding with living and dead relatives inserted, and more doctored pictures that made it appear that their relatives did activities with them after the wedding.With respect to the witnesses’ claim of co-habitation, the appellant and applicant gave contradictory testimony regarding their intimate relations with each other. The appellant testified the applicant always used condoms when the couple had sexual relations after the marriage and during the appellant’s return visit. The applicant testified that he and the appellant did not use any method of protection to prevent pregnancy while having sexual relations because the couple wanted to have children. I do not see how this could have been the case without the appellant having been aware of it. This results in a failure to credibly establish that the appellant and the applicant have shared an intimate relationship as spouses.
Wow....well, there is the proof the IO DO ask questions about peoples sex life.BeShoo said:I was reading an appeals case from India today and thought of this thread. It's from http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/irb/doc/2009/2009canlii84448/2009canlii84448.html. The judge wrote:
This case was a humdinger, by the way. They had doctored photographs from their wedding with living and dead relatives inserted, and more doctored pictures that made it appear that their relatives did activities with them after the wedding.