matthewc
Hero Member
- Jan 18, 2010
- 47
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- Inland (CPC-Vegreville)
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 27.09.2006
- AOR Received.
- 05.12.2006
- VISA ISSUED...
- 11.02.2008
- LANDED..........
- 31.03.2008
As I said already I think everyone needs to take a deep breath and wait to see how the manuals are changed and how this plays out in practice. The concern, though, is that some people in legitimate relationships do get married primarily to gain status. This makes that no longer allowed.
Let's play thought experiments:
Bob is on a work visa and Jane is a Canadian citizen. They've been dating for over a year, are totally besotted with each other, and got engaged and moved in together a few months ago. Their relationship couldn't be more genuine. Bob and Jane plan to have a big wedding with all their family in a couple of years, when they've saved up enough money. They just can't afford it right now. Bob's work visa is due to expire in 6-months, and his employer is concerned they may not be able to get another LMO. They wouldn't qualify as common-law yet, so Bob and Jane decide to have a quiet legal wedding with just a couple of their close friends, so Jane can sponsor Bob for Permanent Residence and they can continue getting on with the life they've chosen together in Canada. They still plan to have the big wedding later on.
Did they get married primarily to gain status under the act? Very arguably, yes. Especially since they're planning their "real" wedding for later.
How will CIC interpret this? I have no idea.
Is this course of action wrong and something CIC should be trying to prevent? You decide.
Let's play thought experiments:
Bob is on a work visa and Jane is a Canadian citizen. They've been dating for over a year, are totally besotted with each other, and got engaged and moved in together a few months ago. Their relationship couldn't be more genuine. Bob and Jane plan to have a big wedding with all their family in a couple of years, when they've saved up enough money. They just can't afford it right now. Bob's work visa is due to expire in 6-months, and his employer is concerned they may not be able to get another LMO. They wouldn't qualify as common-law yet, so Bob and Jane decide to have a quiet legal wedding with just a couple of their close friends, so Jane can sponsor Bob for Permanent Residence and they can continue getting on with the life they've chosen together in Canada. They still plan to have the big wedding later on.
Did they get married primarily to gain status under the act? Very arguably, yes. Especially since they're planning their "real" wedding for later.
How will CIC interpret this? I have no idea.
Is this course of action wrong and something CIC should be trying to prevent? You decide.