I'm really trying to understand, not asking question to mock you.johnjkjk said:There is no "EE quota". Each immigration category has a particular immigration target. The categories can be changed, as happened this year with FSW, FST and CEC as well as the pre-EE backlog having to come from the same fixed target.
Only 15-20% or so of PNP comes through EE. The rest is non-EE. PNP has its own target. PNP has no bearing whatsoever on the low cut-off score.
You can google 'cic supplementary targets for 2016' and read the footnotes too. Also review CIC EE statistics and see how it has been broken down against the target per category. You can also read the EE 2015 report which explains how EE is designed to work against targets for various immigration categories. There are also numerous sources announcing an increase in EE PNP allocation for example.
You also don't seem to understand how targets works. Targets are landings per immigration category.
If you don't know how EE works and if you're not satisfied with a response, then do your own research to find an answer to either confirm or rebut.
Of course, there is no EE quota, there is only one quota for all streams and programs, but the thing is, if you increase quota for one stream, then other streams' quotas must be cut to compensate. That's what happened with this year.
I still don't understand how PNP doesn't affect the EE pool but LMIA does? Don't those people with 600+ CRS from nomination join the pool will increase the average score of the whole thing? so when new draw is called, those people will certainly take many ITAs away from people with sub 600+ points?