Phil89 said:
Oh well..whatever. You should search for a definition of a qualifying job offer. You can leave it your way if it makes you feel better, it doesn't benefit you at all though.
It's not about making me feel better or not, someone asked and I provided my opinion!
You should just read what cic writes and asks, respond only to that.
Did it say "Do you have qualifying job offer"?
NO, and that is why later they ask whether your job required a work permit but no LMIA.
As for your prompt to find the definition of a qualifying job offer, I would say read again my previous post:
Of course you will NOT get those 600, as per CIC a valid job offer requires an LMIA, even if you currently work on previously LMIA-exempt work permit.
You should try to read the questions and not add whatever you feel like they mean, question was clear.
When someone has not only a job offer, but has been employed for quite some time, how can he say "No", when they ask about a job offer, not a valid/qualifying job offer?
I know that OWP do not have NOC on them, but they way they structrured the page, it makes more sense to put current NOC (since it's only dropdown menu) than saying "No" to the job offer
P.S The CRS in the end gave the appropriate points, and of course NOT the extra 600 for the qualifying job offer