No More Litigants accepted to Sue CIC-An email by Tim Leahy

[rp_tp]

is anyone in the forum filled a litigation..need suggestion..

 

[PMM]

Hi

Its great work done.Litigation is the only steps we shouldfollow against CHC.They are simpply vogous people doing nothing ,simply passing time.We should teach them appropriate lesson if required we should contact Canadian media also .This type of idiotic activities should be published in all newspapers all over world so that people of all over work know that Canadian High Commission is a bluff,vogous organisation and the simple way to protect against them is to lodge court case against them.They take crores of money from third world countries and after that just passing time and changing processing time from months to eras.I have a great doubt whether they have any system present or not.Actually this Canadian they don"t know how to work they are lazy people .Most of the time they dodn"t come to office,they know there is no-one who can take charge against them.

Simply vogous----just go for Litigation and take compensation from Canadian High Commission.

If the Minister enacts legislation similar to New Zealand did in 2003 to wipe out the backlog by refunding the fees, do you think Tim is going to refund the money you sent to him?

 

[rp_tp]

definately not.. but are there any chances for them to consider the applicants those who have filled litigation.

 

[khan200us]

Hi


If the Minister enacts legislation similar to New Zealand did in 2003 to wipe out the backlog by refunding the fees, do you think Tim is going to refund the money you sent to him?

On moral grounds, Tim should refund the monies paid to him if his clients did not achieve for what they paid for.

Khan

 

[rp_tp]

Have any one recd any update on this ? .. when is the hearing of this case

 

[Aquib]

On moral grounds, Tim should refund the monies paid to him if his clients did not achieve for what they paid for.

Khan

May be CIC decide those applicant first but that decision does not means giving PR , everyone know that CIC got hundred of ways to mess around application of most of applicant. Only Age , IELTS point and education points they can't play with. But then if they make mind to refuse someone application then it's not hard (at least in 50% of applicant) to get some loop hole in Work experience etc.
Suppose they called your HR manager once and if not get 100% satisfactory answer then where one stand .
Plus if CIC decide those applicant before anyone else then do you think atom is only Lawer on earth. 100s of other lawyers will challenge Cic with 10000s of new clint for even bigger compensation .

I don't think people who join petition are better off in any way with other .

Sorry if I sound rude .

 

[khan200us]

This is what Tim Leahy advised me by email. I am one of the litigants.


Dear Mr. Leahy

Thank you for sharing this news with me. Luckily, I am not in the affected group because I applied in 2009.

Are you going to still fight their cases in the Federal court under your proposed litigation campaign and for which please advise if you are aware of a trial/hearing date.

Tentatively, June 5th.

OR are you refunding the pre Feb. 2008 litigants their money back? because they don't have a case anymore.

There will be no refund of the fee I collected.

Many of my friends and colleagues received email from the visa office of London claiming that they have been instructed to process all bill C-50 Feb 2008-June 2010 by the end of June 2012.

I wonder how they will process all 168,000 files in the next 3 months. Do you have any knowledge about this that they will finish the backlog end June 2012.

They can't, of course, unless their quota is greatly increased. The method they are using is to refuse everyone, claiming to be to incompetent to deduce from the employment letters whether the person has been doing the duties of the job.

Some are suggesting that your litigation has triggered this insane action announced by the Immigration Minister to erase all backlog. We may be the passive beneficiaries but the Minister's actions seem unfair to those who waited for several years only to know that they are out of the queue.

My concern is if my file is processed and I get the medical request before the litigation hearing, then what will be my choices? Still asking for monetary damages from CIC or will you return monies and close the case?

Once you get your visa, your court case becomes moot. Until then, there is no decision to be made.

I will still be seeking damages and, as I said before, there will not be any money returned. The payment was for services already performed. (The fee was only for the application; no fee was included for the action for damages, for which I am to be compensated out of the damages awarded.)

Regards,

Tim

 

[khan200us]

Have any one recd any update on this ? .. when is the hearing of this case

5th June 2012

 

[khan200us]

Hi


If the Minister enacts legislation similar to New Zealand did in 2003 to wipe out the backlog by refunding the fees, do you think Tim is going to refund the money you sent to him?

Tim has informed me that he would not return fees to anyone regardless of the outcome.

Poor pre feb are screwed real bad. Their files are quashed and they lost their monies they paid to Tim in exchange of his legal services.

Though there has been no service delivered to them, they will not get any of the fees back.

Khan200us

 

[cocknbull]

Good thread. Please keep updating Khan200us. +1 for you...

 

[karachi73]

Khan, from your post above :

"...The method they are using is to refuse everyone, claiming to be to incompetent to deduce from the employment letters whether the person has been doing the duties of the job. "

A relative of mine (July 2009 application) just got a refusal based on insufficient evidence that he worked the duties of the NOC - if they are indeed using this tactic to clear the backlog i have to give them a standing ovation and admire their breathtaking arrogance in handling this situation in a way a fourth world bureaucrat would.

 

[khan200us]

Khan, from your post above :

"...The method they are using is to refuse everyone, claiming to be to incompetent to deduce from the employment letters whether the person has been doing the duties of the job. "

A relative of mine (July 2009 application) just got a refusal based on insufficient evidence that he worked the duties of the NOC - if they are indeed using this tactic to clear the backlog i have to give them a standing ovation and admire their breathtaking arrogance in handling this situation in a way a fourth world bureaucrat would.

Hello

I know you are frustrated and so are we all because they say that we are the assets of Canada but in practical terms, they have treated us all like garbage.

So, you can say whatever you like to your hearts content but the only way to come out of this situation is that you file an appeal, preferably through a Canadian lawyer. Please don't trust Indians or Pakistani lawyers even who qualified in Canada. They are mostly incompetent and just want your money.

Yes, they want to clear the backlog to avoid the court decision which is very likely to be against them costing them millions.

All the best
Khan200us

 

[PMM]

Hi

Hello

I know you are frustrated and so are we all because they say that we are the assets of Canada but in practical terms, they have treated us all like garbage.

So, you can say whatever you like to your hearts content but the only way to come out of this situation is that you file an appeal, preferably through a Canadian lawyer. Please don't trust Indians or Pakistani lawyers even who qualified in Canada. They are mostly incompetent and just want your money.

Yes, they want to clear the backlog to avoid the court decision which is very likely to be against them costing them millions.

All the best
Khan200us

So "Tim" made an easy $500,000 if the backlog is legislated away.

 

[shaziabibi]

VITAL INFORMATION SHARED PULSE 1 FOR YOU !

This is what Tim Leahy advised me by email. I am one of the litigants.


Dear Mr. Leahy

Thank you for sharing this news with me. Luckily, I am not in the affected group because I applied in 2009.

Are you going to still fight their cases in the Federal court under your proposed litigation campaign and for which please advise if you are aware of a trial/hearing date.

Tentatively, June 5th.

OR are you refunding the pre Feb. 2008 litigants their money back? because they don't have a case anymore.

There will be no refund of the fee I collected.

Many of my friends and colleagues received email from the visa office of London claiming that they have been instructed to process all bill C-50 Feb 2008-June 2010 by the end of June 2012.

I wonder how they will process all 168,000 files in the next 3 months. Do you have any knowledge about this that they will finish the backlog end June 2012.

They can't, of course, unless their quota is greatly increased. The method they are using is to refuse everyone, claiming to be to incompetent to deduce from the employment letters whether the person has been doing the duties of the job.

Some are suggesting that your litigation has triggered this insane action announced by the Immigration Minister to erase all backlog. We may be the passive beneficiaries but the Minister's actions seem unfair to those who waited for several years only to know that they are out of the queue.

My concern is if my file is processed and I get the medical request before the litigation hearing, then what will be my choices? Still asking for monetary damages from CIC or will you return monies and close the case?

Once you get your visa, your court case becomes moot. Until then, there is no decision to be made.

I will still be seeking damages and, as I said before, there will not be any money returned. The payment was for services already performed. (The fee was only for the application; no fee was included for the action for damages, for which I am to be compensated out of the damages awarded.)

Regards,

Tim

 

[Aquib]

Hi


So "Tim" made an easy $500,000 if the backlog is legislated away.

Lil Tim looks like a bigger crook then CIC with regard to pre 2008, I say he making using all fool. If he really good person then he should gone for no-win-no-fee.
I suggest you all complaint against him too in relevant court as one cannot make people fool like this