Yes, his BG was "not needed".Russian said:So when you received PPR you BG showed "not needed"?
Yes, his BG was "not needed".Russian said:So when you received PPR you BG showed "not needed"?
That's exactly what I supposed. The BG check happens when application is complete.On Dec-15 my notes show that R10 OK and that was the day my bg status changed I guess it means your application is complete if it changed to not needed
I though that ECAS - In Process happens when R10 OK is done. Isn't R10 check done by CIC and then moved to Ottawa for processing? I was hoping for something substantial like eligibility check completed when status moved to NN. Wishful thinking, I guess. ;DRussian said:I found some useful post in the thread of November AOR applicants.
That's exactly what I supposed. The BG check happens when application is complete.
Mine change in like 2 days too...SimonG14 said:Hi guys,
Same thing here, I'm FSW Outland and here is my timeline :
ITA - Dec 18th
AOR - Jan 9th
Review in progress
Medical passed - Jan 11th
Background check in progress - Jan 14th
Background check not needed at this time - Jan 16th
I guess we just have to wait and see.
Any idea, how far your application assessment reached before being reassigned? and was there any movement after the day your status changed?PN2511 said:got my notes today,
my file also has been moved around due to " workload (re)distribution" as someone had previously mentioned.
I think it is the reason why we have had the issue of the bg check going a step backwards. It is an educated guess however and can not say it with certainity
hmm, that's a bit discouraging. I wonder why some got reassigned and others didn't. But I guess there isn't much we can do about it. Thanks for letting us know.PN2511 said:none! by the looks of it the first review is done... last change was on 2/12/2015 and my file has not been touched after !
Reassigned to local VO?PN2511 said:got my notes today,
my file also has been moved around due to " workload (re)distribution" as someone had previously mentioned.
I think it is the reason why we have had the issue of the bg check going a step backwards. It is an educated guess however and can not say it with certainity