ddobro2
Champion Member
- May 4, 2011
- 38
- 124
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- Buffalo, NY
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
Oh you called ;D I didn't have a chance to. This is a good Q&A page but I still say this stuff about Privacy Act vs. Access to Information Act is not straightforward. Hopefully despite using the old form and no proof of residing in Canada (well, they didn't ask for it), they will see that I am making the request for myself and thus no $5 (I'm one of those few cases - I suppose they're fewer - where the application was managed completely by the sponsored person). I totally get your frustration about that. If I were to guess, the consent letter is to cover their butts legally if some spouse who has no idea their sponsor ordered the deets on their application and starts reading things known to CIC but not known to the sponsor. The $5 fee is probably just a way to raise a little bit of revenue for that government agency without, knowing that the fee is more than justifiable considering the request came (in theory) from abroad.
spicymum said:Amen to that, sthomas!
Dair and ddobro2, just in case U were still wondering, I was able to confirm from the CIC Contact Centre, as well as the website (http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/atip/faq.asp) that I needed to apply under the Access to Info Act (hence the $5) since I was requesting info on someone else - ie spouse.
BTW I think thats just dumb ...afterall, did we - the sponsor - not send out the application ourselves?!! Have they CIC not been communicating with us about the PR application (do some/most of us not have our addresses on there as point of contact)? What is the need for that stupid consent letter again. :-\
Anyways, not worth my sleep at night...that $5.
And AMEN to that comment ddobro2 about this process already costing us an arm and a leg...so what's $5? lol