- Nov 11, 2009
- 71
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- Manila
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- April 30 2012
- Doc's Request.
- N/A
- File Transfer...
- Sep 27 2012
- Med's Request
- April 15 2013 (re-med)
- Interview........
- Waived
- Passport Req..
- March 18 2013
- VISA ISSUED...
- May 22 2013
- LANDED..........
- June 6 2013
If the application is finalized within 15 months of the original medical and the medical results are the only thing standing in the way of a visa.. was my interpretation.CanadianJeepGuy said:So if I understand this correctly where a medical certificate has shown the applicant to be in good health for admission they can extend the validity of the certificate. Where the applicant's medical certificates have rendered them inaddmisable they will request another medical certificate should it have expired.
"This procedure is limited to situations where the final decision of an officer is pending due only to the expiration of a medical certificate. If anything else is pending, the officer should not use this procedure."
Makes sense. And they reccommend the visa officers to do this:
"It is recommended that the officer review the validity of the medical certificate of all the persons being part of an immigration application and request the reassessment of the medical file for those eligible for the process if needed."
And then comes this:
Contact the Regional Medical Office (RMO) responsible for the file at the following e-mail addresses:
(...)Manila- Traditional visa offices attached to RMO Manila: Manil.mc @ international.gc.ca
Entitle your e-mail ‘Reassessment of an applicant's medical file for the issuance of a new medical certificate';
Provide the applicant's name, ID number, date of birth, date of initial IME, and country of residence for the last 6 months.
(...)
Upon receipt of the request for reassessment, the MOF or the HB delegated staff will:
Review the medical file to determine if there is sufficiently relevant and up to date medical information to provide a new opinion of admissibility on health grounds;
Request additional medical information if a new opinion based upon the existing information in the medical file is not possible;
Assess the medical file including any new additional medical information as needed;
Provide a new opinion of admissibility or inadmissibility on health grounds;
Enter the new ‘M' profile in the CIC electronic platform (such as GCMS or FOSS);
Send an e-mail to the officer who requested the reassessment to confirm that the process has been completed.
It is recommended that the officer issue medical instructions for a new full routine medical examination done by a panel physician if the results of additional testing are unlikely to be provided quickly."
Based on the fact that nobody has been able to 'avail' of this, there must be a problem - one of the two items highlighted above.
It's just my speculation that the doctor's office won't be bothered to re-assess the medical for no charge. Since it's more efficient to do a whole new test - and they will be paid 5K in full - I think that they exercise this clause across the board:
"It is recommended that the officer issue medical instructions for a new full routine medical examination done by a panel physician if the results of additional testing are unlikely to be provided quickly."