irresponsible spouse/sponsor

[soblue3]

Actually, I read the whole painful stream of statements you have made. More than once in the last hour you have posted several slanderous statements.

ohh..really...saying that cheaters often lie, and hurt other people and that they spread stds...or the part that those who protect cheaters must be knowing something about it? ...since you seem to know something about education...you will know what proof is and that twisting things and comments is not acceptable..you will also educate your self on the issue of cheating and what it means and what it does and stop implying threats. whatever i wrote is based on research...i enjoy reading you know. this part of the forum is to help genuine people sponsor their spouses..not to endorse threats and abuse..dont loose your focus.

 

[COPRQuestion]

Actually, I read the whole painful stream of statements you have made. More than once in the last hour you have posted several slanderous statements.

Can I ask a question, I don't want to make a similar mistake.

Someone pointed out that among the OP's ramblings some of it could be construed as racist and worth reporting to a moderator. For the life of me I couldn't see which parts were racist. Could someone point them out for me please?

Thanks

 

[soblue3]

Can I ask a question, I don't want to make a similar mistake.

Someone pointed out that among the OP's ramblings some of it could be construed as racist and worth reporting to a moderator. For the life of me I couldn't see which parts were racist. Could someone point them out for me please?

Thanks

lol many people like to twist what is said here...same like they like to say that putting down those who hurt others is slander...perfect example of what abusers like to resort to.

 

[profiler]

ohh..really...saying that cheaters often lie, and hurt other people and that they spread stds...or the part that those who protect cheaters must be knowing something about it? ...since you seem to know something about education...you will know what proof is and that twisting things and comments is not acceptable..you will also educate your self on the issue of cheating and what it means and what it does and stop implying threats. whatever i wrote is based on research...i enjoy reading you know. this part of the forum is to help genuine people sponsor their spouses..not to endorse threats and abuse..dont loose your focus.

lmao!

 

[COPRQuestion]

lol many people like to twist what is said here...same like they like to say that putting down those who hurt others is slander...perfect example of what abusers like to resort to.

Fair enough, honestly, there's so much back and forth on this topics I've kind of lost where it is.

But I commend you all for making my lunch hour more interesting.

Oh out of interest, why did you not pass your immigration interview?

 

[ImABule]

Well all I can say is that this is probably the most entertaining thread I've read here so far. What amuses me even more is that the OP has disappeared and left everyone else to argue away.

Can't help but wonder if that was the original intention, but either way a thoroughly distracting topic to read through on this dark, rainy Friday afternoon in Hong Kong.

I would have to wonder if it was the other way round and I was 7 years older than my wife and she had just finished high school and her parents had had me locked up, I'd probably see that as a sign it wasn't meant to be and perhaps retire gracefully from the situation.

One thing I do agree with the OP on is that I also am not a massive fan of the new Philippine President

What's wrong with Duterte?

I like his policy on drug pushers.

He's one politician who actually stuck to his campaign promise, and he's cleaning up the country.

A+ in my books.

 

[COPRQuestion]

What's wrong with Duterte?

I like his policy on drug pushers.

He's one politician who actually stuck to his campaign promise, and he's cleaning up the country.

A+ in my books.

Up to him to pursue that one, that's his gig. I don't know enough about international law to comment.

But when you're China is on your doorstep making plays for what the sea around you, my thoughts are not to offend the man running the country that is basically protecting you.

Anyway, not really a discussion for this forum as it's about immigration.

 

[soblue3]

Fair enough, honestly, there's so much back and forth on this topics I've kind of lost where it is.

But I commend you all for making my lunch hour more interesting.

Oh out of interest, why did you not pass your immigration interview?

oh its not so hard to not pass in certain circumstances..if you would like more information about interviews, questions and red flags you can message me.

 

[truesmile]

Can I ask a question, I don't want to make a similar mistake.

Someone pointed out that among the OP's ramblings some of it could be construed as racist and worth reporting to a moderator. For the life of me I couldn't see which parts were racist. Could someone point them out for me please?

Thanks

I can't find any racist remarks either.

 

[truesmile]

He's totally jealous of his brother cause he received dowry from his future parents in law. Like he was asking for dowry after 2 years of marriage. In the old days, it's done before the wedding. It's now also an illegal practice in India. Plus we're froma different culture. My parents didn't want to pay. But he was totally demanding dowry from my parents. He wants the house and he thinks my parents are gonna give that house to me when they're dead. I don't even care cause I want my parents to live long.

Of course, it would be done before or around the time of the wedding. Certainly not two years later. Anyway, tell him that in YOUR culture it's the girls family that receives a DOWRY, and NOT the males.

Also, that would be YOUR house, not HIS. And if it's in the Philippines he'll never get a hold of it, foreigners aren't
allowed to own property in the Philippines.

 

[Rob_TO]

i dont think so thats why i wrote "under fear of being responsible for the other for 3 years". In addition the person who started this thread was being sponsored..plus it does not matter as this is a general issue which applies to both sides.

The original poster who started this thread had nothing to do with a cheating spouse.

And the Canadian sponsor can break up with the PR for any reason, and conditional PR will apply. If the PR cheated or not is irrelevant.

In fact the whole topic of cheating and if it constitutes abuse, is completely irrelevant to everyone that posted in this thread.

 

[browning911]

lol many people like to twist what is said here...same like they like to say that putting down those who hurt others is slander...perfect example of what abusers like to resort to.

Um Soblue No! What she said could definitely be construed as racist.

When the OP (Scylla +1) told her this she modified what she wrote. I saw it before she modified and the OP (Scylla) that told her this was correct.