canuck_in_uk said:
Please go tell Syrian refugees or Congolese rape victims or the parents of missing and murdered Aboriginal women here in Canada about the "atrocities" you are facing.
People chose to go through the inland sponsorship process. They had other options: apply outland, move to the other spouse's country, move to a third country, etc. And there are rules and very clear laws regarding immigration, which are in place to protect Canada. It is unfortunate that those who DID SCAM the system have made it so much harder for others but first and foremost, Canada needs to protect itself from such further abuse. I am a Canadian citizen and I fully understand this; I never expected Canada to simply let my partner come live here. As for the lack of transparency, that is common in pretty much every government organization in the world.
Don't be so melodramatic as to compare Canada to a communist country.
As for the first sentence of your response let me quote a classic: don't be so melodramatic as to compare the atrocities in Canada's immigration system to the atrocities of Syria or Congo. But really how shallow can one get? Just because there are terrible things committed in the world any injustice, any abuse, any ATROCITY that is less terrible becomes justifiable? Shouldn't maybe the whole judicial system be abolished? Why punish criminals if there are war crimes far more terrible? Or how far do we go down this road? How about sexual harassment at the workplace? Isn't that a hilarious complaint in light of rape and mayhem in Congo? If per chance you get mugged on the street you would not think of going to the police because there are people who get murdered in the same situation?
Or is it that the atrocities of the Canadian immigration system can only be defended if they are juxtaposed against war crimes? Some defense....
To the second part: you either don't know how things work, or you don't want to know. There is and has been no clear information about wait times. You enter the system and lo and behold there is no processing for 6 months out of 12. And no explanation either. But that of course is perfectly OK in the light of missing aboriginal women. Or hunger in Africa. It is OK to let students with a 3-day training work on files that determine a huge chunk of the life of applicants. They make mistakes, applicants suffer, but what is that in comparison to (place here you favorite suffering).
Now about scammers. So it is OK to treat everybody as if they were scammers instead of working out a system that can catch most of the scammers. Nice clear road to a police state. There are criminals. "Successful" criminals who get away with it. So, let's assume everybody is a criminal and treat them accordingly. Let's monitor phones, build up a system where citizen A is spying and reporting on citizen B and vice versa, let's establish curfews, so at least the state can rest at night, etc. Or where do you want to draw the line? If a Canadian is gullible enough to fall for an inland scammer, a fortune hunter, that is not a problem, the judicial system can handle it (or not). It is only the foreign scammers that are so lethal that everybody needs to suffer less one of them can get away with it. But as somebody kindly explained it would be too difficult and time consuming to set up a properly functioning system. Let the applicants wait, after all there is so much suffering in the world, they have no real reason to complain.
I am grateful to you for shedding light on the mindset of the politicians and bureaucrats involved in this immigration system. It is: "we can get away with anything and everything, because there are places that are much worse. We can do whatever we want, because these applicants might be scammers and scammers need to be punished. We can do anything we choose to, if the applicants don't like it, they can crawl back under their stone." Good. But why not say so on the front page of the CIC website? And then potential applicants could make informed choices.