All education (primary, secondary and further education) should be free to all people and paid and managed by the government.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer.
I see you are working hard, let us do it, its my 4th review today.
Many people argue that education is the primary catalyst in boosting the economy of a country. If any [ write "a"] country has an educated populace, they can create value for the world and in return, they will bring prosperity to their country. I also believe that education has an far-reaching effect on our society and government should bear the burden of educating their countrymen, so that poor can get desired support to come out of poverty and they can contribute to the economy of the nation.
"Many people argue that " every body else will be writing that, so please find some better way to say the same.
Solid introduction, no problem at all ( I mean anything less than 7 band )
well written, clearly stated everything, there's no mess or confusion.
First of all, education has become so expensive in the world that many people cannot even imagine of receiving quality education.
"First of all" every body else will be writing.... improve it.
"many people cannot even imagine of receiving quality education" little odd, say simple, " that even well doing families can't afford it for their children, or "that only people born with silver spoon in their mouth can afford it [idiomatic language]"
Rising poverty and continuous inflation has made it impossible for commoners to get the desired qualification.
its almost the same as previous sentence, they call it redundant, adding no value to paragraph, a line to stuff words, to increase word count, be careful with these kind of lines.
They are at a disadvantage and they cannot recover from it, even if they work hard.
beware again, meat is missing, miss to convey the message strongly. words with low or no value.
It is a form of discrimination that a poor person cannot get the academic credentials, which a rich person is receiving.
For instance, if
I [
a] boy is born in a rural area of India, [
and] his father cannot afford to enroll his son in a reputable university.
Thus, his family will be further entangled into a virtuous cycle of poverty.
slightly wrong use of thus,
Therefore, government should intervene to provide the necessary catalyst to improve the lives of derelicts.
hmm you have good vocab.
Secondly, education is directly proportional to the economy and crime rate of any country. If a nation has majority of educated population, they can work towards increasing their income and as a consequence, their country will prosper. Similarly, a better economy impacts the crime rate as everybody will be able to earn their living comfortably. Therefore, if a government spends money on education of people, it can cut the budget of law enforcement. For instance, Scandinavian countries are a prime examples of this. There policing and military budgets are minimal, while their education system is superior than any country of the world.
this para is much better than previous one, there's no problem in it, or the one I can find.
its strange to see that kind of difference between both paras. I feel your thoughts were scattered when you started writing, it took you some time to get in the right flow.
Altogether, It will not be bad decision to invest in the education of people. Ultimately, it will improve the lives of millions as well as it will have a long lasting socio-economic impact. This expenditure should not be counted as an expense, but an investment in humans.
i am assuming, it it took much time to write first para than the second one and conclusion together.
like
first para time = second para time + conlcusion
tell me if this happened or not, if it is, then just write more and more, try to write without much thinking...
------
well you can get 7 for this one, comparing to mistakes I made, band 7 I got from an ex-examiner.
but in actual test, they are your enemies, I don't trust them to be little easy on you, they will surely award you 6.5, but I am sure revaluation can increase it to 7 or even 7.5 (maximum)
Its my view, so don't take it to the heart.