As always, a bunch of thanks. I really appreciate the time and effort you put to help us. God bless you!
Yes, you are right is a little unreasonable conclusion. I dare to admit that at the time of composing the essay, few ideas came to my mind. Well, this situation is always happens so it is a huge hindrance on my way to succeed..Ok so I think this topic is a little bit difficult. I didn't get many thoughts when I read it.
Very decent opening paragraph. Avoidable grammatical errors. But they are not major. I like the last line a lot. Gives a clear structure of the essay to follow. I think the wildlife argument is a bit of stretch. The other two make sense to me.
I used " NUMBERLESS" as adjective, thinking that it was a synonyms of "countless, innumerable, countless number of.."
Ok honestly as I said I found the topic tough. Based on that this is a pretty decent attempt but you could have made it a lot better by taking care of few things. Idea is really good but the progression of the idea is not really great.
Me too. I found in a book of IELTS preparation: Cambrigde.
It is fine. I find the argument to be stretch but besides a few grammatical errors it is largely fine.
OKayOk so I think this topic is a little bit difficult. I didn't get many thoughts when I read it.
Very decent opening paragraph. Avoidable grammatical errors. But they are not major. I like the last line a lot. Gives a clear structure of the essay to follow. I think the wildlife argument is a bit of stretch. The other two make sense to me.
As Spanish is my mother tongue, I'd like to know what exactly mean your ever comment "very decent paragraph" is it good or bad? In Spanish, we have the same word, same spelling, but I'm not quite sure about the meaning. In short, in my language it is something not good, in fact, more bad than good. Is the same in English?
Ok honestly as I said I found the topic tough. Based on that this is a pretty decent attempt but you could have made it a lot better by taking care of few things. Idea is really good but the progression of the idea is not really great.
It is fine. I find the argument to be stretch but besides a few grammatical errors it is largely fine.
OKay
Okay I get it ... your argument was if children have not spent time in nature they may not be good enough to save wildlife. But does that make them a threat once they become adults? Wow!! Where have you gone in your conclusion?
Okay I get it ... your argument was if children have not spent time in nature they may not be good enough to save wildlife. But does that make them a threat once they become adults? Wow!! Where have you gone in your conclusion?