I see your point. I should have probably added one or two lines refuting the claim of bicycles being the best solution.See, you should start looking at questions logically, you should answer the question directly, it should not be left for the examiner to understand your position, your position must be clear in the essay. Why are you giving the another solution when they are asking for opinion on if cycle is best solution? If it is not explain it why and if you believe it is best solution explain why.
But look, I don't agree when you say that we cannot present the best option which in my essay was public transport. This is much related to a question I posted to a native IELTS teacher. It was:
If one agrees fully to the opinion essay is it required to write the other side's narrative as well? Or do we just need to support our opinion with 2 ideas in two BPs?
And I quote the teacher here:
"I think the other members have explained it well. Is it required? No. Should you? Probably, depending on your goals & ability. Certainly it's possible to do well in TR just discussing one side; it's certainly easier. If you look in the band descriptors, it talks about supporting and extending "positions“ or " main ideas" up to Band 7. Then it switches to a judging the "response" in band 8. A fully developed response would need to refute the reasons for disagreement".
In a nutshell, if you are aiming for a higher band, it is advisable to mention the side you do not agree with but with a crafty denial. But do I have the same question here? May be not. However, this is what I was thinking while writing this essay. Anyway that's me getting entangled in IELTS tantrums.
Thank you all for your intellectual input.
Last edited: