I will get you next week as I still hav to get my file which is with my relatives in Canada.future_canadian said:We need the appendix/checklist.
I will get you next week as I still hav to get my file which is with my relatives in Canada.future_canadian said:We need the appendix/checklist.
rupm said:Dear Asif,
I have a question regarding payment from standard chartered Bank Bangladesh.Is it mandatory for primary applicant to go to bank for DD or dependent can do.
ashif_eee said:Ha ha LOL...
I guess--He was talking abt GTiwana ...
+1 for ur humor....![]()
![]()
![]()
Oscar7 said:[size=9pt] And the most funny part is not that he got the wrong information, but how innocently and politely he asks the question. LMAO!!!
PS - Future just had to take a pill for BP to calm himself down!
ashif_eee said:Its clearly stated on Guideline buddy.....![]()
It says:
"Factor 3: Work experience (maximum of 15 points)
You will receive points for the number of years of full-time paid work (or the equivalent in part-time paid work) you have obtained within the last ten years. Full-time means at least 30 hours of paid work in one week."
Century said:Why do think, continuous job cannot be counted if someone work in two companies without any break?
Century said:@ future - Canadian
;D ;D ;D ;D
I feel so sorry to hear this.![]()
![]()
![]()
future_canadian said:We need the appendix/checklist.
yogi44 said:.......REGARDING PROOF OF FUNDS.....
Hi friends... Sorry for some more questions...hope i will again get good answers like every time..
1. I will be using fixed deposit option. Can i have two or three FDs on my name which in total is of CAD 12000 or i have to deposit the whole amount in one FD?
2. After two months from now, thers my elder brothers wedding... Can i withdraw some amount from that and will again deposit within two or three weeks...will that be fine...or not?
I am ready with all my documents except this proof of fund...please guys help me out !
future_canadian said:GTiwanna's case has made me think about something:
There was a poster whose ECAS was showing In Process, then the status disappeared and his file was returned. This made everyone anxious because it meant that fee charging was no guarantee of PER, whereas we previously believe it was at least 99%. It also made us assume that fees are cashed only after a basic completeness check, and the closer scrutiny of the file comes after fee charging and determines whether you get PER.
Now we have GTiwanna's case, in which his DD was returned with his application, apparently either due to mismatch of job duties or for a very specific deficiency (not mentioning working hours) in his work experience letter. This would lead one to believe that the review of the application pre-fee cashing is more than just a basic completeness check, but does look deeper. It seems to be a contradiction.
Anyone have any thoughts on this?
Oscar7 said:[size=9pt] Actually this was known from the time mk's file got back. I think they take a high level look during completeness check and sometimes an incorrect reference letter can still very well pass through this check, only to be caught later (like in Jignesh's case). But if there are any major issues with the reference letter that might catch their attention right upfront even before the fee is charged (like for mk and now for this case). The funny part is it is CIC's call as to what looks outright incorrect to them, to pull it aside upfront and not even charge the fee for, versus cases like Jignesh's where it passes the completeness check and fee gets charged only to be returned later.
I will also post the link to my earlier post (post # 40941) on this:
http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/fsw-2014-applicants-timeline-lets-network-here-t199004.40935.html
Also, the complete Visa process is on post # 40904 at the below path (in case you wish to refer that):
http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/fsw-2014-applicants-timeline-lets-network-here-t199004.40890.html
future_canadian said:You can have any number of different sources so long as they total the required amount.
You are free to move your money around however you like so long as the local VO will not suspect you don't actually have the required settlement funds if they look into your account history.