That is a very excellent idea! Implementing these ways of sorting would make things incredibly easier and more convenient.dmitrych said:
Good idea. I approve.dmitrych said:Hi everyone,
we have a new idea proposed by PinguimGuy regarding a possible improvement to the default spreadsheet sorting order, and we'd like to discuss it
In my opinion, this idea looks really good and is worthy to be the new default sorting order:
Keep applications sorted by their status as it is right now, but inside each status, sort by a different column:
For "At CIO" applications, sort by App.received date in descending order.
For "Payment charged" applications, sort by Fee Encashed Date, in descending order.
For "PER Received" applications, sort by PER Received Date, etc.
I've implemented a Filter View, which demonstrates the proposed sorting order exactly as described:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/11gAbKSoDoOr1s8_raB1qwz0i-ZH0NyNWhhn18O6kHwQ/edit#gid=1627896255&fvid=1141630743
This link sorts properly only when current number of viewers is less than 50, so here's also a screenshot, just in case (clickable):
This way we can see all the news for a particular status right away, and this is exactly the question so many people often ask here. For example, all newly charged applications are at the top of the "Payment charged" section, and by looking at their received date you can easily see that CIC is currently processing payments for May 12 applications, and that some May 8-9 applications are still being processed as well.
You can also easily see that we have our first May 7 applicants with PER, - they are at the top of PER received section.
Similarly, all newly transferred applications are at the top of "File Transferred" section. Etc.
The old default sorting order among applications of the same status is by NOC. I remember, it was because we wanted to be able to count how many applications there are per each NOC. However, now there are so many applications in many different statuses that the usefulness of sorting by NOC looks unclear anymore. It seems easier to just check the "Apps by NOC" sheet rather than counting this manually.
If we approve the new sorting order, the old one will be accessible via Filter Views, in case anyone still needs it.
In my opinion, this sorting order is really much more useful than the old one, but I'd like to hear opinions of our forum members on this.
If you support it, or in case you have any objections or other better ideas, please tell.
If there are no objections, I can make this the default sorting order
absolutely wroonnng.... attitude post! for one- i love oscar and vouch that many do here... his selfless effort to help others and many other ppl like him which made this forum a success , speaks for itself..as u have said yourself... u havent read anything..then y even bother to comment... if it wasnt for him and his peers u or me wouldnt have had this platform to know what we know... :-Xdcba said:
aav, I think you should not mind what oscar7 writes or says. I have not even read his long messages but i know by now he must have written some nonsense again.. He has nothing else to do and so he keeps writing all mess here with his silly attitude. In real life(and also here) he must be loser having no friends and bad relations with everybody. people must be ignoring him all the time as nobody likes him, he cant confront anyone in real life so he just needs some place where he can mess around and feel important(to himself).
now after reading my comment, his bottom will burn a lot and he will start jumping, crying and continue his nonsense even more and now when he does this, dont feel pity for him..
just ignore him and leave him alone...!!
Good luck with your process
I agree that the current sorting by NOC is not helpful when trying to see how many applications are ahead of yours that still need to be processed. Having a filter option by received date, CC charged, and PER issued dates would make it much clearer to see your standing in the table.dmitrych said:The old default sorting order among applications of the same status is by NOC. I remember, it was because we wanted to be able to count how many applications there are per each NOC. However, now there are so many applications in many different statuses that the usefulness of sorting by NOC looks unclear anymore. It seems easier to just check the "Apps by NOC" sheet rather than counting this manually.
If we approve the new sorting order, the old one will be accessible via Filter Views, in case anyone still needs it.
In my opinion, this sorting order is really much more useful than the old one, but I'd like to hear opinions of our forum members on this.
If you support it, or in case you have any objections or other better ideas, please tell.
If there are no objections, I can make this the default sorting order
dcba said:
aav, I think you should not mind what oscar7 writes or says. I have not even read his long messages but i know by now he must have written some nonsense again.. He has nothing else to do and so he keeps writing all mess here with his silly attitude. In real life(and also here) he must be loser having no friends and bad relations with everybody. people must be ignoring him all the time as nobody likes him, he cant confront anyone in real life so he just needs some place where he can mess around and feel important(to himself).
now after reading my comment, his bottom will burn a lot and he will start jumping, crying and continue his nonsense even more and now when he does this, dont feel pity for him..
just ignore him and leave him alone...!!
Good luck with your process
:
There is nothing to panic at the moment. You should wait for a couple of weeks more at least.can2132 said:
I respect the peers who are genuine, know how to talk, phrase the words in a humanly civilized manner, selfless, respectful. Kudo to them for being on this forum and helping others and contributing to people's success but this guy Mr Oscar7 needs to learn some basic lessons of communication to be on the ground. he needs to help himself before he helps others with his low choice of words..red9999 said:
Oscar7 said:[size=9pt] Hi, Sorry to hear that can2132. That is indeed disheartening! We can understand how painful that long wait can be. Request you to share:
1. The content and format of your reference letter(s).
2. Any area in the overall package that you have doubt on?
Will need to decipher what could have happened, as anything is possible...share facts about the contents please
shahid_canadaim said:Glad to see the showering of the PER mails.. Congrats for all those who got it and Best wishes for those who expect to get it..
Well I am still in preparation of my package and waiting for ECA from WES (So, fingers crossed and need your wises/prayers). I dont know if I would meet the CAP for 2171, because that the NOC I qualify and have been working as a Information Consultant for about 8 years.
My question or rather clarification is on POF (Proof of Funds)
I checked in the forum and for 3 Members its $18,097 CAD, which is around 10.5 lacs in Indian Rupees. I have asked my dad to transfer it to my account and some I had in Policies which I took on and will be moving to my Savings Account which is in SBH (State Bank of Hyderabad).
Do I need to hold this sum of 10.5 lacs in my account till I land in Canada or till I get PER for Visa interview .. till when ?
Should the POF letter show the amount equivalent in Canadian dollar as well..Any one has any format, that would be of a great help.
**THIS FORUM IS SIMPLY OUTSTANDING**
Regards,
Shahid
U r bro but not all are resolvingGoku said:Whos attacking ?? We are resolving things.
- First match the NOC which your duties and experience closely matches and is the least competitive among the available options.serenity_eee said:
