This is the $64,000 question.v_i_r_u_s said:Any 7th May Applicant Got PER Mail?
This is the $64,000 question.v_i_r_u_s said:Any 7th May Applicant Got PER Mail?
False. For FSW, the VO for the USA is CPC-O which so far is by far the fastest VO.MILIND1985 said:Well Brother first thing all applications should be mailed at nova scotia . but he has option of choosing his visa office i.e newdelhi or newyork or losangeles , according to cic timings provided on site newdelhi vo takes 22 months to process application but US visa offices takes 35 months so choice is your
future_canadian said:This is the $64,000 question.
It's May 4, 2013. They haven't updated it. Check the "updated on" date to see when the page was last updated, but that doesn't tell you the "as-of" date. Nobody knows the as-of date, but it must currently be somewhere between May 5-7.Arjun_Singh_76 said:Guys,
The Total completed applications page is still showing the status as of May 4th.
Is that correct or they just forgot to update the date.
Regards,
Arjun Singh
WOW ! how perfect calculations you have made.... ;D ;Dfuture_canadian said:This is the $64,000 question.
Well, I can answer it for $63,999..... hahaha . ttman is the name of person who has crossed this hurdle.future_canadian said:This is the $64,000 question.
Depends on if his previous company manager is still working in the same company or not. If the experience was at company A, and the previous manager is now at company B, it shouldn't be on the letterhead of either company. If the previous manager is still with company A and the applicant is at a new company, sure it should be on the letterhead of company A if possible.v_i_r_u_s said:Reference letter must be in Company letterhead
In document check list it is clearly written "Copies" for settlement funds.ANANJAY said:1.) Photocopy
2.)original
3.) Original
future_canadian said:False. For FSW, the VO for the USA is CPC-O which so far is by far the fastest VO.
The government of Canada has recommended a NOC to you. Are you going to go against their recommendation, when they are the ones who will evaluate your application?engmSalem said:Dear Seniors,
Kindly I send an email to noc-cnp @ workingincanada.gc.ca and they recommend NOC 2171 to the following duties...Although I thought 2173 is more close...please advise urgently:
- About 5 years as a Technical Team Leader .
- He has demonstrated outstanding programming skills in the project.
His responsibilities have included:
• Demonstrates professional knowledge of Dot Net framework 3.5, C#3, ASP.NET, AJAX, jQuery , Java Script and XML.
• Building reports using Crystal report and Crystal report server.
• Understands the benefits of various programming languages and Creates XML Schemas.
• Creates efficient and logical databases using SQL server 2008.
• Perform analysis, requirements gathering and gab analysis and convert it to analysis and design documentation supported with UML diagrams.
• Designs and codes superior technical solutions and applying design patterns.
• Recognizes system deficiencies and implements effective solutions
• Consistently delivers high-quality modules.
• Understands the benefits of the various design methodologies and object oriented.
• Leading a team assign tasks to each member and follow up tasks with them
• Generates enthusiasm among team members.
• Proactively seeks opportunities to serve in leadership roles.
• Challenges others to develop as leaders while serving as a role model and Facilitates effective team interaction.
• Acknowledges and appreciates each team member's contribution.
• Suggest areas for improvement in internal processes along with possible solutions.
• Deploy and Configure the solutions at test server as well as the production servers and monitor the performance.
• Draft specification documents, user training manual an presentations, test case manual, technical documentation and
• Prepare and give project presentations to the customer.
• Develop application/Solution plans for the project
• Participates in writing technical proposals and specifications .
Thanks In advance
Not really accurate. There are many cases including mine where the supervisor has moved on to a different company or the company has a policy against putting such details in a reference letter. In those cases a personal letter accompanies by an explanation of why a letter on company letterhead was not possible have generally been deemed credible. There has been much discussion of the best alternatives to a letter on company letterhead. The issue isn't black or white, the issue is credibility.k_b said:Though we have seen positive responses from CIC for reference letters on normal white paper with business card, but, not ll can go away with using this as an alternate.
This should be the last alternative....
Letter head is mandatory..... No where in document checklist or application guide CIC has mentioned about accepting reference letters on plain a4 paper. It is on the discretion of visa officer to accept or reject it. So my advice is to avoid any kind of risk that may result in app rejection.
I had one company that I had to do this way and my DD has been cashed.gsingh80 said:Can you elaborate on this that how many applications have been accepted even after providing reference letter on A4 sheet from a senior as their company was unwilling to provide it on letterhead.