Century
VIP Member
- May 2, 2014
- 876
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- Singapore
- NOC Code......
- 0111
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 07-05-2014
- Nomination.....
- 30-07-2014
- AOR Received.
- 09-09-2014
- Med's Request
- 24-10-2014
- Med's Done....
- 04-11-2014
- Passport Req..
- 05-12-2014
- VISA ISSUED...
- 22-12-2014
- LANDED..........
- 08-06-2015
Some of the Reasons for returns (i.e. no CC/DD charged) in FSW 2013shah2014 said:@ All the analysts, specially Dr. Century
Rather than number crunching, I would like to make a qualitative C.P (class participation)
I was not around in FSW 13, but i think the process has been streamlined since then. At least to the extent that "job reference letter and matching with NOC" is now being done before CC charging as compared to post CC charging in 2013 (and then processing refunds).
My observation is based on some of the rejections rationale (for post CC charging rejections) which include
1. Missing experience letter
2. Self deceleration not acceptable
While this year around, applicants having such deficiencies have been rejected before CC charging (based on returned files).
Net net, in my opinion, past statistics are not relevant and %age of rejection after CC charge will be considerably lower than 1%.
Disclaimer: Quite possible that last year they had similar procedure, however, the above cited post charging rejections were due to slippage by some inexperienced staff, which can be repeated this year around as well.
viranee Job Description mismatch with NOC
reddevil7281 Job experience mismatch with NOC
kanan Self attested duties rejected by CIC
madman Job experience mismatch with NOC
Oscar7 said:Great observation, Partner Shah! No wonder I feel so proud of the high caliber analysis of Oscar Shah LLP. Unmatched expertise!!!! 8) 8) 8) 8) 8)
This sounds like what the minister has been saying of quicker and better work this year.
+1 to you partner!