It will definitely not be effective before Mid-April. After that nobody knows what they will do.godhelp said:Friends what are the chances that rules will
be effective on April 1st.
thanks,
Godhelp
It will definitely not be effective before Mid-April. After that nobody knows what they will do.godhelp said:Friends what are the chances that rules will
be effective on April 1st.
thanks,
Godhelp
nadeem55 said:Nobody can predict for 2017 but according to CIC projection that, the citizenship applications will be finalized in within 6 months or less.
Now the odds could be different then what they predicted, next year 2016 CIC will overwhelmed by the huge flood of citizenship application which could make them derail from the track of faster processing, they might use more resources to complete the application in time and eventually increase the fees from $600 to $1000 and return hundreds of applications because of incorrect fees, they might introduce some other legislation to block further new applicants to apply, only the immigrants will agitated and govt. will keep on playing with rules and immigrants.
Where the proof in that? It is a coincident that the new rule of citizenship deadline happen to fall in the election year. And it is expected of the government to legislate laws / changes that they promised to keep that were made during the election campaign. So that they can claim that they uphold their election promises. That is to be expected.MUFC said:I believe that this is only a showcase for the elections ZingyDNA.
MUFC said:You called a coincident but for me it was a well planed to be right before the elections in order to make a good impression. If they were so eager to make it happen , they could have done it long time ago.
Well if that was the promise about the faster processing times from last elections, it is pretty clear, that just supports my idea, that it should not be taken seriously , because it is just a promise.
The intend to reside thing actually suggest that the processing speed should not be very fast, how otherwise they would be genuinely convinced that the applicant would like to settle here for good.
The intend to reside does help prevent people from taking off after applying and only coming back for test and oath. However while it does not stop people from becoming Canadian of Convenience, extending the qualification time, does work in the hopes that by the time the would-be CoC's become Canadians, they may change their mind and actually want to stay and be a contributing member of Canada society.MUFC said:You called a coincident but for me it was a well planed to be right before the elections in order to make a good impression. If they were so eager to make it happen , they could have done it long time ago.
Well if that was the promise about the faster processing times from last elections, it is pretty clear, that just supports my idea, that it should not be taken seriously , because it is just a promise.
The intend to reside thing actually suggest that the processing speed should not be very fast, how otherwise they would be genuinely convinced that the applicant would like to settle here for good.
MUFC said:You called a coincident but for me it was a well planed to be right before the elections in order to make a good impression. If they were so eager to make it happen , they could have done it long time ago.
Well if that was the promise about the faster processing times from last elections, it is pretty clear, that just supports my idea, that it should not be taken seriously , because it is just a promise.
The intend to reside thing actually suggest that the processing speed should not be very fast, how otherwise they would be genuinely convinced that the applicant would like to settle here for good.
Really!!! My PR wife feels like a Canadian. So the line you heard "You are a Canadian, once you are in Canada" does apply as an expression to mean that PR can do anything a Canadian can do. The only way I can see that your thought that it is not true is if the Charter of Rights and Freedom and the Constitution doesn't apply to PR and only to Canadian citizens.CanadianCountry said:I agree with MUFC that it was preplanned to fall on election year and Tories will seek reelection based on this and other bills they brought.
Screech sees everything differently. Screech is the case of "being Canadian" before you are even Canadian. PRs are NOT Canadian. I personally had similar situation as screech and i believe it happens with a lot of people. Once you start living here, you start to think like Canadian and your heart says you are Canadian. But in reality you are not unless you have Citizenship certificate. Happened to me, i felt/thought like i'm Canadian for many years, but sudden self-realization brought me to reality that no-one is a Canadian unless you are citizen.
It reminds me an incident when somebody was telling somebody else (which i overheard) "You are a Canadian, once you are in Canada" doesn't matter your status. So not true.
screech339 said:Really!!! My PR wife feels like a Canadian. So the line you heard "You are a Canadian, once you are in Canada" does apply since PR can do just about everything a Canadian can do. The only way I can see that your thought that it is not true is if the Charter of Rights and Freedom and the Constitution doesn't apply to PR and only to Canadian citizens.
screech339 said:Really!!! My PR wife feels like a Canadian. So the line you heard "You are a Canadian, once you are in Canada" does apply as an expression to mean that PR can do anything a Canadian can do. The only way I can see that your thought that it is not true is if the Charter of Rights and Freedom and the Constitution doesn't apply to PR and only to Canadian citizens.