Tapak said:
That's an interesting note. [refreence to needing 183 days in each calendar year] So technically, anyone arriving on or after 1st July may not be able to count remaining days in that year towards residency for citizenship application.
True, but of no significant consequence: the PR who arrives after June 30th will not meet the qualifications following the 4th year anniversary until, likewise, after June 30th of that year, so the year of applying can be (subject to number days absent in the year) the 4th clendar year in which the 183 day requirement is met rather than the year of arrival.
That is, for a PR with no absences after arrival:
-- arrival in 2012 after June 30, does not meet 1460 requirement until after June 30th 2016, on the 4th year anniversary of the day of arrival, and thus 2013, 2014, 2015, and the first 183 days present in 2016 will constitute the four calendar years with 183+ days presence.
-- arrival in 2012 before June 30, meets the 1460 day requirement again upon 4th year anniversary of landing in 2016, and the four calendar years with 183+ days are 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015
ari5323 said:
may be the law means fisical year, not calendar year. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Statute explicitly used the term
calendar year; no doubt about what that means, as in it means calendar year.
Caution: No one here can say for sure when the coming-into-force date will be. Even educated guesses are still just a guess. No more. No one here can definitively rule out May 15th, let alone any other day. How this affects any particular individual varies. Sure, the odds are good that it will not happen as of May 15th, but again no one here can definitively assure it will not, or that it will not happen May 22, or May 29 . . .
the public does not know the date as yet.
This is said without knowing whether Minister Alexander offered anything definitive in response to questions today.