mirki said:
Guys, sorry for spamming here, but I thought I might be doing everything wrong.
Back to the residence calculator: I am confused about how to enter "from" and "to" to calculate absence.
For instance I went to Denmark from 2012-10-16 to 2012-10-21 (5 days). Basically on 2012-10-16 I was in Canada. I left Canada with a night flight and entered Denmark on 2012-10-17. So should I the day I leave Canada or the day I enter Denmark? How do half days calculated? Is there any official documents on that? The FAQ at Residence Calculator does not have any specific information on this.
From is the day you exit Canada. If you exit five minutes after midnight, that's the date you left. If you do not exit until 23 hours and forty minutes later, ten minutes before midnight, that is still the day. And it is probably not the date the plane actually takes off but the time it is scheduled to take off.
To is the day you arrive in Canada. Whether you arrive ten minutes after midnight or 23 and a half hours later at twenty minutes before midnight. This time will be the time you actually check in at the PIL or the kiosk upon arrival . . . which can be a half hour or more after the plane's wheels touch the ground.
Relative to half days, if you are referring to the credit for half days a person can acquire for time living in Canada prior to becoming a PR, it is easiest just to be sure the "From" and "To" dates entered are accurate and let the online residence calculator figure it out. It does not make arithmetic mistakes.
Frankly, I concur in the caution expressed by
MUFC about applications based on barely meeting the minimum threshold as the deadline hour approaches, especially if you are relying on time in Canada before becoming a PR, and especially given the lengthy absence immediately after applying. After all, by the time CIC looks at your case in any detail, you will exactly fit the profile of an applicant who
applied-on-the-way-to-the-airport. That is not a formal factor but it is a characterization of the sort of applicant CIC is especially on alert to watch for. Assuming it has no relevance to you in fact (just a coincidence you are going abroad for a lengthy absence at this juncture, no bearing on long term plans), it is the appearance that could drag your case into the mire of not just RQ but RQ with suspicion.