I got Permanent Resident as dependent child had basic education too. Moved to Canada as an adult with Graduation. Gained canadian experience one year. My PR was under residency obligation. IAD appeal rejected. returned to Parent country with employer Job Offer with Employer issued experience certificates within a month. So, I applied under CEC. it was rejected after 18 months.
Is that law says that CEC must be gained via temporary/work permit.
Am I wrong choosing a wrong class?
All papers are in order even now. If so can I try now through Express Entry?
Dependant PR should not be considered as CEC applicant?
--------------
After 18 months case rejected. act quoted. anyone has idea?
R87.1(2)Subsection11.1 & 2(1)
to jfmamj:
--------------- CIC decision
I have now completed the assessment of your application for a permanent resident visa as a member of the Canadian Experience Class and have determined that you do not meet the requirements for immigration to Canada.
According to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, applicants in the Canadian Experience Class are assessed on the basis of the pass/fail requirements set out in subsection R87.1(2). The assessment of these criteria determines whether a worker with Canadian experience will be able to become economically established in Canada. The criteria are:
· knowledge of English or French,
· Canadian skilled work experience,
· temporary resident status during the period of work experience in Canada
Your application was assessed based on the occupations which you identified as part of your skilled work experience in Canada:
I am not satisfied that you meet the temporary resident status requirements because you did not possess temporary resident status during the period you acquired your stated work experience.
Subsection 11(1) of the Act states that a foreign national must, before entering Canada, apply to an officer for a visa or for any other document required by the Regulations. The visa or document shall be issued if, following an examination, the officer is satisfied that the foreign national is not inadmissible and meets the requirements of this Act. Subsection 2(1) specifies that unless otherwise indicated, references in the Act to “this Act” include regulations made under it.
Following an examination of your application, I am not satisfied that you meet the requirements of the Act and Regulations for the reasons explained above. I am therefore refusing your application
----------
Is there any possibility that Lawyer can reopen the case to succeed?
----
Is that law says that CEC must be gained via temporary/work permit.
Am I wrong choosing a wrong class?
All papers are in order even now. If so can I try now through Express Entry?
Dependant PR should not be considered as CEC applicant?
--------------
After 18 months case rejected. act quoted. anyone has idea?
R87.1(2)Subsection11.1 & 2(1)
to jfmamj:
--------------- CIC decision
I have now completed the assessment of your application for a permanent resident visa as a member of the Canadian Experience Class and have determined that you do not meet the requirements for immigration to Canada.
According to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, applicants in the Canadian Experience Class are assessed on the basis of the pass/fail requirements set out in subsection R87.1(2). The assessment of these criteria determines whether a worker with Canadian experience will be able to become economically established in Canada. The criteria are:
· knowledge of English or French,
· Canadian skilled work experience,
· temporary resident status during the period of work experience in Canada
Your application was assessed based on the occupations which you identified as part of your skilled work experience in Canada:
I am not satisfied that you meet the temporary resident status requirements because you did not possess temporary resident status during the period you acquired your stated work experience.
Subsection 11(1) of the Act states that a foreign national must, before entering Canada, apply to an officer for a visa or for any other document required by the Regulations. The visa or document shall be issued if, following an examination, the officer is satisfied that the foreign national is not inadmissible and meets the requirements of this Act. Subsection 2(1) specifies that unless otherwise indicated, references in the Act to “this Act” include regulations made under it.
Following an examination of your application, I am not satisfied that you meet the requirements of the Act and Regulations for the reasons explained above. I am therefore refusing your application
----------
Is there any possibility that Lawyer can reopen the case to succeed?
----