Yes..good so far...CBA is in full support of C-6 !!! Now Q&A..Linda was not allowed 2nd question (which is good given alternative' views) as each senator is allowed 1 question.galant said:
Again, chairman also asked the same question. flipping it around saying 55-64 is a working age and not senior citizens according to canadian standards. barbara retierated that is is a focus on 'smaller population' as immigrants have already gained necessary language skills.....good one againmonalisa said:
Another good argument against 'deporting naturalized citizens' is to 'test them through Canadian court and rehabilitation system'. This was from Barbara, the CBA vice chairadey786 said:
And the professor from UoT is also dont think deporting would solve the problem...moreover, discrimination with 2 classes of citizens.adey786 said:
The committee has one more meeting tomorrow.If no amendments are suggested ,then I believe there will one more meeting maximum.So how do you think that will meeting will be close 22 March because according to me that seems a bit far.Dont want to sound over optimistic but if all goes well they should wrap up the bill in committee stage by first week of March.monalisa said:
I don't see the sense in your argument. Should PR's pay less for other government services as well then? Should they be entitled to discounts on renewing their car registration or property taxes since they have less rights than citizens?MasterGeek said:
Yes.....pk10 said:
Majority seems to be in favor of C-6. From conservatives, Linda tried to raise objections but they are dealt with appropriately.
Arguments by Canadian Lawyers Association (federal and Quebec) before the committee. Then there was an individual representation from the Law professor of University of Toronto and another independent lawyer. Tomorrow is the second session on this bill so perhaps tomorrow we will see some concrete update in terms of fate of this bill.noba el king said:
