Senator Oh is presenting this issue!Coffee1981 said:Since people doubted I had a high-level friend at IRCC, and told me I didn't know what I was talking about when I said the revocation proceeding amendment was unconstitutional... Well... You're hearing it here first. The Conservatives will introduce another amendment today RE: allowing minors to apply for citizenship without a Canadian citizen parent.
Enjoy the delays, folks!!!
They will accept it as it is, to be honest age 60 is fair, language requirements very easy, to have fair knowledgeRedfield said:Senator Harder voted against the motion, I do not think that the government will approve that amendment
I might be mistaken, but I don't think 60 years vs 54 is a deal breaker for HOC. But we'll see soon!razerblade said:People are speculating about HoC rejecting the language amendment and sending back to Senate aka delays!
it could not win when independents and cons put together.Redfield said:It passed I think, that is bad news
your rightVarangian said:I might be mistaken, but I don't think 60 years vs 54 is a deal breaker for HOC. But we'll see soon!
i totally agreemonalisa said:They will accept it as it is, to be honest age 60 is fair, language requirements very easy, to have fair knowledge
The promise to complete the process by the first week of May!!!Shmak2017 said:What`s final outcome of today`s session on c-6 ?
Coffee1981 said:Since people doubted I had a high-level friend at IRCC, and told me I didn't know what I was talking about when I said the revocation proceeding amendment was unconstitutional... Well... You're hearing it here first. The Conservatives will introduce another amendment today RE: allowing minors to apply for citizenship without a Canadian citizen parent.
Enjoy the delays, folks!!!