Coffee1981 said:Since people doubted I had a high-level friend at IRCC, and told me I didn't know what I was talking about when I said the revocation proceeding amendment was unconstitutional... Well... You're hearing it here first. The Conservatives will introduce another amendment today RE: allowing minors to apply for citizenship without a Canadian citizen parent.
Enjoy the delays, folks!!!
Redfield said:Senator Harder voted against the motion, I do not think that the government will approve that amendment
I might be mistaken, but I don't think 60 years vs 54 is a deal breaker for HOC. But we'll see soon!razerblade said:People are speculating about HoC rejecting the language amendment and sending back to Senate aka delays!
it could not win when independents and cons put together.Redfield said:It passed I think, that is bad news
Varangian said:I might be mistaken, but I don't think 60 years vs 54 is a deal breaker for HOC. But we'll see soon!
i totally agreemonalisa said:They will accept it as it is, to be honest age 60 is fair, language requirements very easy, to have fair knowledge
Shmak2017 said:What`s final outcome of today`s session on c-6 ?
Coffee1981 said:Since people doubted I had a high-level friend at IRCC, and told me I didn't know what I was talking about when I said the revocation proceeding amendment was unconstitutional... Well... You're hearing it here first. The Conservatives will introduce another amendment today RE: allowing minors to apply for citizenship without a Canadian citizen parent.
Enjoy the delays, folks!!!