+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

Apply Inland after IEC expire keep working and now AIP refuse

screech339

VIP Member
Apr 2, 2013
7,887
552
Category........
Visa Office......
Vegreville
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
14-08-2012
AOR Received.
20-11-2012
Med's Done....
18-07-2012
Interview........
17-06-2013
LANDED..........
17-06-2013
frege said:
This assumes that the law is at least publicly available. If it's impossible to find out from a reliable source (other than an internet forum) what the rules actually are, then that changes things.
According to CIC glossary:

Implied status: if a visitor, student or temporary worker applies to extend their status, prior to the expiry of that status, they may legally remain in Canada until a decision is made on the application. In this situation, the person has implied status.

According to FW1 - foreign worker manual

Under section 11.2 - categories of work with validity periods which may not be extended.

Category: international experience canada programs. Most programs are 6 months or 1 year.

Note that the implied status is for those who can "extend" their status. IEC can't be extended. So by combining the 2 above, it is pretty understandable and not "hard to find" or "unclear" that IEC does not get the benefit of "implied status". The rules seems pretty clear to me and is publicity available to those to look for it. The onus is on the applicant to make sure that his/her status is maintained legally.

Screech339
 

frege

Hero Member
Jun 13, 2012
953
29
Category........
Visa Office......
Paris
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
01-05-2012
AOR Received.
none
File Transfer...
01-08-2012
Med's Done....
02-12-2011
Interview........
none
Passport Req..
28-11-2012 (copy only)
VISA ISSUED...
05-12-2012
LANDED..........
15-12-2012
screech339 said:
According to CIC glossary:

Implied status: if a visitor, student or temporary worker applies to extend their status, prior to the expiry of that status, they may legally remain in Canada until a decision is made on the application. In this situation, the person has implied status.

According to FW1 - foreign worker manual

Under section 11.2 - categories of work with validity periods which may not be extended.

Category: international experience canada programs. Most programs are 6 months or 1 year.

Note that the implied status is for those who can "extend" their status. IEC can't be extended. So by combining the 2 above, it is pretty understandable and not "hard to find" or "unclear" that IEC does not get the benefit of "implied status". The rules seems pretty clear to me and is publicity available to those to look for it. The onus is on the applicant to make sure that his/her status is maintained legally.

Screech339
Yet if you have a closed work permit and you apply for an open one, you get implied status. Are you "extending" your work permit in this case?
 

screech339

VIP Member
Apr 2, 2013
7,887
552
Category........
Visa Office......
Vegreville
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
14-08-2012
AOR Received.
20-11-2012
Med's Done....
18-07-2012
Interview........
17-06-2013
LANDED..........
17-06-2013
frege said:
Yet if you have a closed work permit and you apply for an open one, you get implied status. Are you "extending" your work permit in this case?
A closed work permit is a regular work permit. If you mean by closed as it has expired. Then you are not extending. You are re-applying for a new work permit. However if you applied before your work permit expires, then you are extending it. Thus falls under "implied status". However if your work permit is valid when you applied for inland sponsorship, then the work permit also falls under implied status.

Open work permit is a different type of permit that only offered to those who applied for PR inland.

IEC and PGWP are a special type of work permit that are not extendable. And can only be used once. The only time IEC can be used more than once is if there is a agreement with a specfic country and Canada to allow it. The renewal of EIC can be done outside Canada, not within Canada, thus still cannot get "implied status" since it can only be renewed outside Canada.
 

frege

Hero Member
Jun 13, 2012
953
29
Category........
Visa Office......
Paris
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
01-05-2012
AOR Received.
none
File Transfer...
01-08-2012
Med's Done....
02-12-2011
Interview........
none
Passport Req..
28-11-2012 (copy only)
VISA ISSUED...
05-12-2012
LANDED..........
15-12-2012
screech339 said:
A closed work permit is a regular work permit. If you mean by closed as it has expired. Then you are not extending. You are re-applying for a new work permit. However if you applied before your work permit expires, then you are extending it. Thus falls under "implied status". However if your work permit is valid when you applied for inland sponsorship, then the work permit also falls under implied status.

Open work permit is a different type of permit that only offered to those who applied for PR inland.

IEC and PGWP are a special type of work permit that are not extendable. And can only be used once. The only time IEC can be used more than once is if there is a agreement with a specfic country and Canada to allow it. The renewal of EIC can be done outside Canada, not within Canada, thus still cannot get "implied status" since it can only be renewed outside Canada.
No, by "closed" I mean employer-specific, not expired. "Closed" is the opposite of "open."

You say that if you apply to replace an IEC work permit with a new open one (scenario 1), then you're not applying to "renew" your work permit. Presumably you're saying this on the basis that the new open one is a different kind of work permit.

But if you have an employer-specific permit based on an LMO, and you apply to change this to an open work permit (scenario 2), you still get implied status based on the new application. So it must be that in this case you're applying to "renew" your work permit, even though what you're applying for is a completely different kind of permit.

What is the difference between these two cases? You say the difference is that, in scenario 1, an IEC permit isn't extendable. But, even though an LMO-based work permit may be extendable, in scenario 2 you are not applying to extend it; instead you are applying for something new and different.

So my question is why the word "renew", which is the one that appears in section 201(1) of the IRPR, would be applicable in scenario 2 but not in scenario 1.
 

screech339

VIP Member
Apr 2, 2013
7,887
552
Category........
Visa Office......
Vegreville
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
14-08-2012
AOR Received.
20-11-2012
Med's Done....
18-07-2012
Interview........
17-06-2013
LANDED..........
17-06-2013
frege said:
No, by "closed" I mean employer-specific, not expired. "Closed" is the opposite of "open."

You say that if you apply to replace an IEC work permit with a new open one (scenario 1), then you're not applying to "renew" your work permit. Presumably you're saying this on the basis that the new open one is a different kind of work permit.

But if you have an employer-specific permit based on an LMO, and you apply to change this to an open work permit (scenario 2), you still get implied status based on the new application. So it must be that in this case you're applying to "renew" your work permit, even though what you're applying for is a completely different kind of permit.

What is the difference between these two cases? You say the difference is that, in scenario 1, an IEC permit isn't extendable. But, even though an LMO-based work permit may be extendable, in scenario 2 you are not applying to extend it; instead you are applying for something new and different.

So my question is why the word "renew", which is the one that appears in section 201(1) of the IRPR, would be applicable in scenario 2 but not in scenario 1.
You are talking about a employer-specific permit based on LMO which is a regular work permit, which is extendable. It is not EIC permit. A different kind of work permit. Don't try to mix IEC into the same "closed" work permit. You are trying to combine IEC into the same category as a regular work permit. If you are going to try to mix IEC into another category, mix it in with PGWP as it follows the same rules requirement as PGWP.

The situation is if your work permit (non eic) expired before applying for inland sponsorship, you basically went out of status and become illegal when your work visa expired to the time your application has been submitted. Once the application is submitted, you are put back under "visitor" implied status since your work visa has expired prior to sponsorship. If your work visa is valid at the time of submittal, you would be under "work implied status" until PR is done. If your work visa expired prior to your sponsorship, you are under "visitor implied status", thus cannot work, even if you submitted your OWP application with the sponsorship papers. You cannot work until you get you status changed from "visitor" status to "OWP" status after AIP.

If you are on valid IEC when you submit your sponsorship, since EIC cannot be extended within Canada and can only be renewed outside Canada with specific countries, you can only work until EIC is expired. This is where the problem lies. After it is expired, you are not a visitor, you became "illegal" but you are not as your sponsorship papers are in process. This is why CIC tells people on IEC to switch to visitor status before IEC expires. If the applicant doesn't do this, this does not give them an excuse to "believe" they have been granted "implied status" under IEC. As far as CIC is concerned, if you didn't switch to visitor before IEC expires, they will see you as a visitor status. They will not give you the benefit of continuing to work after IEC expires because you didn't do your part in switching to visitor after IEC expires.

BTW: effective August 31, IEC is under CIC's jurisdiction now, so they will be no confusing between Foreign Department and Immigration department on how IEC operates. People using the "lack of communication" between Foreign Department and Immigration Department will not be able to use this excuse either to continue working past IEC. Post Graduate Work Permit was under CIC's control all along and now EIC will follow the same rules as PGWP visa holders have to follow.

CIC is not doing the legwork to make sure you are on proper status. That is your job. You got to do the leg work in getting yourself under proper status and under what status you want to be under. CIC is not going to do it for you. They are going to assume worst and put you under "visitor" status whenever they can, whether you like it or not unless you do the work to be put under proper status. IE, submitting sponsorship before work, visitor, study visa expires. If you submit your application, after it expires, you are out of status as a worker, student, visitor until CIC recieve your application and once they do, they will put you under "visitor implied status".
 

frege

Hero Member
Jun 13, 2012
953
29
Category........
Visa Office......
Paris
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
01-05-2012
AOR Received.
none
File Transfer...
01-08-2012
Med's Done....
02-12-2011
Interview........
none
Passport Req..
28-11-2012 (copy only)
VISA ISSUED...
05-12-2012
LANDED..........
15-12-2012
screech339 said:
This is why CIC tells people on IEC to switch to visitor status before IEC expires. If the applicant doesn't do this, this does not give them an excuse to "believe" they have been granted "implied status" under IEC. As far as CIC is concerned, if you didn't switch to visitor before IEC expires, they will see you as a visitor status. They will not give you the benefit of continuing to work after IEC expires because you didn't do your part in switching to visitor after IEC expires.
Can you quote where CIC tells people on an IEC about this?

Obviously there are two questions:

1) Is CIC interpreting the IRPR correctly?

2) Is CIC giving people fair warning of their interpretation.

You may be able to show that CIC is giving fair warning, if you can quote what CIC tells IEC permit holders, which would be good. But even then, your arguments aren't convincing as to why the word "renew" is applicable in scenario 2 above but not scenario 1. In neither case is a person applying to get the same kind of work permit again.
 

screech339

VIP Member
Apr 2, 2013
7,887
552
Category........
Visa Office......
Vegreville
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
14-08-2012
AOR Received.
20-11-2012
Med's Done....
18-07-2012
Interview........
17-06-2013
LANDED..........
17-06-2013
frege said:
Can you quote where CIC tells people on an IEC about this?

Obviously there are two questions:

1) Is CIC interpreting the IRPR correctly?

2) Is CIC giving people fair warning of their interpretation.

You may be able to show that CIC is giving fair warning, if you can quote what CIC tells IEC permit holders, which would be good. But even then, your arguments aren't convincing as to why the word "renew" is applicable in scenario 2 above but not scenario 1. In neither case is a person applying to get the same kind of work permit again.
Under scenario 1 you mentioned, you are stuck with IEC employer until it expires. And you are not renewing it if you apply for OWP while holding IEC. Two difference work permits. And when IEC expires, you are then not able to work until you get OWP status change. If you get OWP before IEC expires, then nothing changes, except now you can work for any employer.

Under scenario 2, you are basically stuck with that specific employer until you get your open work permit. Yes, you are under "implied work permit" under LMO work permit but you are stuck with that employer until you get your OWP which allow you to work with any employer.

This is no difference from the US TN visa. It is an specific employer temporary work visa. I cannot switch to a different employer and if I do, I have to re apply for a new TN visa for a different employer. Even though I switch to a new employer with a new TN visa, the new TN visa is not the same, it is now under a new employer, now a different TN visa, even though it has the same name "TN" visa. It is still a new different TN visa under new work parameters.

"Renewing" means you are reapplying for the same visa you currently have before it expires. "renewing" does not means you are renewing after it expires for the same visa. You are thus re-applying for a new "same" work visa only this time you would still need a new LMO and employer job offer, etc.

I understand your thinking that the definition of "renew" imply applying for new visa after it expires and is the same as renewing in terms of extending it before it expires. But CIC doesn't see it that way. They only see "applying for new visa" after it expires, and "extending" as extending it before it expires for same work visa even though it is the same work visa. But OWP and a close work permit are two different work visas. If you apply for OWP while under IEC, you are not renewing it, you are changing your status to OWP. and when IEC expires, you cannot work until your status is changed to OWP.
 

Harju

Star Member
Apr 4, 2010
197
13
Category........
Visa Office......
Seoul
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
12/09/2010
AOR Received.
25/10/2010
Passport Req..
02/11/2011
VISA ISSUED...
28/11/2011
LANDED..........
31/12/2011
Are not open and closed work permits just regular work permits with different conditions attached? Section 185 allows conditions to be attached to a work permit. This is what makes the difference between open and closed work permits. They are not different permits; they are permits with different conditions. When you have a closed work permit and apply for an open work permit you are renewing (or extending) your status as a worker with a request for a change of conditions. You have implied status as long as you honor the conditions of your previous work permit. You guys are making it way too complicated.

The law seems clear to me:
1) Subsection 201(1) is the provision that allows you to extend a work permit.
2) Section 186(u) provides implied status to those work permit holders who have made an application under subsection 201(1).
3) IEC permits cannot be extended therefore 201(1) is not applicable.
4) An IEC permit holder cannot have implied status as provided by 186(u) because they cannot make a valid application under 201(1).
 

screech339

VIP Member
Apr 2, 2013
7,887
552
Category........
Visa Office......
Vegreville
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
14-08-2012
AOR Received.
20-11-2012
Med's Done....
18-07-2012
Interview........
17-06-2013
LANDED..........
17-06-2013
Harju said:
The law seems clear to me:
1) Subsection 202(1) is the provision that allows you to extend a work permit.
2) Section 186(u) provides implied status to those work permit holders who have made a application under subsection 202(1).
3) IEC permits cannot be extended therefore 202(1) is not applicable.
4) An IEC permit holder cannot have implied status as provided by 186(u) because they cannot make a valid application under 202(1).
Thanks for providing this info. I may be totally wrong on the open work permit vs closed work permit. I was under the impression that a close work permit is just a regular work visa that basically say you can only work for a specific employer. And the open work permit allows you to work for any employer and only offered to those who apply for inland sponsorship.

You have provided what this thread was about. The inability to continue working after iEC expired and that IEC does not have ability to be granted "implied status" under inland sponsorship.

One person has said that there were no clear rules about it when there is. Although I don't have the link for your source, please provide link to these laws you listed so that this discussion can come to an end with a definite conclusion that a person cannot work past IEC expiry date while under inland sponsorship until OWP has been granted.

Screech339
 

Line.a

Champion Member
Nov 23, 2010
1,272
30
Denmark
Category........
Visa Office......
CPC-V
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
09-02-13
AOR Received.
27-02-13
Med's Request
08-02-14
Med's Done....
15-03-14
Interview........
Waived!
Passport Req..
Waived!
VISA ISSUED...
OWP: 25-02-14
LANDED..........
23-07-14
But we are still legally staying in Canada when IEC runs out and we stop working right? It YET does NOT make sense to me with all of this. I am fully aware that the issue is continue the job and not stopping as soon as it runs out. We did extend my stay online and explained we were applying for PR inland and we also paid and sent an OWP along with the PR. So WHY would CIC only give me until August 9th? I DIDN'T extend it again because i'm under the impression that having a pending OWP makes me allowed to stay - EVEN if i had an IEC before.
 

screech339

VIP Member
Apr 2, 2013
7,887
552
Category........
Visa Office......
Vegreville
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
14-08-2012
AOR Received.
20-11-2012
Med's Done....
18-07-2012
Interview........
17-06-2013
LANDED..........
17-06-2013
Line.a said:
But we are still legally staying in Canada when IEC runs out and we stop working right? It YET does NOT make sense to me with all of this. I am fully aware that the issue is continue the job and not stopping as soon as it runs out. We did extend my stay online and explained we were applying for PR inland and we also paid and sent an OWP along with the PR. So WHY would CIC only give me until August 9th? I DIDN'T extend it again because i'm under the impression that having a pending OWP makes me allowed to stay - EVEN if i had an IEC before.
There is nothing confusing about your situation. You applied for extend your status as a visitor after your IEC expired with your sponsorship. So your status is legal in Canada. And because you were granted an extension, you were on visitor status while the process is in play. When your visitor status ran out aug 9, you then went into "implied status" of visitor status. So there is no confusion on your part. Since you stopped working before IEC expired, you are in compliant since you followed the rules of IEC. If you had continued to work past IEC expire date, you would be in non-complant since you violated the rules of IEC visa. You did not assume you would be under "IEC implied status" since there is no such thing.

Had you submitted your sponsorhip while your IEC was valid, you would have had to extend your status in Canada as a visitor before IEC expires. But this wasn't the case with you. You followed the proper proceedings in maintaining your status in Canada.

So you got nothing to worry about. As it stands, you went into "visitor" implied status once your aug 9th extension expired.

Screech339
 

Line.a

Champion Member
Nov 23, 2010
1,272
30
Denmark
Category........
Visa Office......
CPC-V
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
09-02-13
AOR Received.
27-02-13
Med's Request
08-02-14
Med's Done....
15-03-14
Interview........
Waived!
Passport Req..
Waived!
VISA ISSUED...
OWP: 25-02-14
LANDED..........
23-07-14
screech339 said:
There is nothing confusing about your situation. You applied for extend your status as a visitor after your IEC expired with your sponsorship. So your status is legal in Canada. And because you were granted an extension, you were on visitor status while the process is in play. When your visitor status ran out aug 9, you then went into "implied status" of visitor status. So there is no confusion on your part. Since you stopped working before IEC expired, you are in compliant since you followed the rules of IEC. If you had continued to work past IEC expire date, you would be in non-complant since you violated the rules of IEC visa. You did not assume you would be under "IEC implied status" since there is no such thing.

Had you submitted your sponsorhip while your IEC was valid, you would have had to extend your status in Canada as a visitor before IEC expires. But this wasn't the case with you. You followed the proper proceedings in maintaining your status in Canada.

So you got nothing to worry about. As it stands, you went into "visitor" implied status once your aug 9th extension expired.

Screech339

I guess that makes sense. I have been so confused about it all. Thank you very much for making it clear!
 

oh101

Star Member
Jul 16, 2013
71
2
Line.a said:
I guess that makes sense. I have been so confused about it all. Thank you very much for making it clear!

I think you have been thinking about this, do you?

BTW if you don't mind Can I ask if you were man or women? Because I feel like sometime women are thinking and worry a lot more than men. ;)
 

Line.a

Champion Member
Nov 23, 2010
1,272
30
Denmark
Category........
Visa Office......
CPC-V
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
09-02-13
AOR Received.
27-02-13
Med's Request
08-02-14
Med's Done....
15-03-14
Interview........
Waived!
Passport Req..
Waived!
VISA ISSUED...
OWP: 25-02-14
LANDED..........
23-07-14
oh101 said:
I think you have been thinking about this, do you?

BTW if you don't mind Can I ask if you were man or women? Because I feel like sometime women are thinking and worry a lot more than men. ;)
I'm an all worrying female trust me.. With everything! :)
 

frege

Hero Member
Jun 13, 2012
953
29
Category........
Visa Office......
Paris
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
01-05-2012
AOR Received.
none
File Transfer...
01-08-2012
Med's Done....
02-12-2011
Interview........
none
Passport Req..
28-11-2012 (copy only)
VISA ISSUED...
05-12-2012
LANDED..........
15-12-2012
Harju said:
4) An IEC permit holder cannot have implied status as provided by 186(u) because they cannot make a valid application under 201(1).
But if you have an LMO permit, you are not really "renewing" it when you apply for an open work permit, unless, as you say, they are the same kind of permit. You say they are essentially the same kind of permit, but with different conditions attached. Could the same not be said of the IEC permit? That it is also a regular work permit, but with certain conditions attached? In that case the word "renew" in 201(1) would be applicable to it as well in case an open work permit is applied for.