Cappuccino
VIP Member
- Jun 23, 2009
- 409
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- London
- NOC Code......
- 3131
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 30-Aug-2010
- AOR Received.
- 15-Dec-2010
- IELTS Request
- Sent with app - 8.5 band score
- Med's Request
- 13-Apr-2011
- Med's Done....
- 19-Apr-2011
- Passport Req..
- 28-June-2011
- VISA ISSUED...
- 21-July-2011
- LANDED..........
- 27-Aug-2011[br][br]ECAS[br]Recd By VO.....: 11-Feb-2011[br]In Process.......: 15-Mar-2011[br]Decision Made.: 25-Jun-2011
Hi - yes ok that makes sense.Maani1985 said:Everyone knows that first 1.5 months after new rules, there were hardly anyone who arranged all documents and sent to CIO, but after that almost everyone sent documents at once. It is not surprising for me at all. Because it is not mentioned that CIO with take same number of applications every day.
As far as returning application are concern, I am pretty sure they change their number upon evey application returned. If they don't do it, there is no way that they can findout that how many applications they actually received. No matter if the application is approved or denied, they have to isue it a sequestial number. And that happens in US and Canada quite often. Because at some point in time, they have to show statistics.
But it only tells us how many they actually received, not how many they put into processing. So if the number is 13,000 - some of those will be rejections. If a third were rejected it means only 10,000 count towards the total cap. Likewise for NOCs, if 700 were received for your noc and a third were rejected it's only like 450 which count towards the cap.
At least I hope that's how they are doing it. If it counts towards the cap the moment it is received, then an application which is re-sent twice actually counts as 3 applications towards the cap even though it is only 1, which would be just silly!
Wayne.