rajkamalmohanram,
Sorry to bother you. I know I made some people bored about the post of "representative", I am not sure you saw that topic or not: http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/a-question-may-sensitive-about-representative-t450283.0.html
But now I want to ask this question again by a different and simple way, SORRY about ask you again but last night I met my school mate again and occasionally raised this topic again.
May I have your kindly understanding and reply the question:
Do you think which of following circumstances could be considered as "misrepresnetation"?
1. Applicant paid someone (unauthorized lawyer/consultant), the paid person fills the application form, write documents, EE system, uploads files on behalf of applicant, the email box is the lawyer/consultant's, but not applicant's.
In a word, the consultant do things on behalf of applicant and communicate with IRCC on behalf of applicant. But applicant didn't fill the IMM5476 form.
2. Applicant paid someone (unauthorized lawyer/consultant), the paid person fills the application form, write documents, EE system, uploads files on behalf of applicant, the email box is the applicant's.
In a word, the consultant do things on behalf of applicant and but the communication between applicant and IRCC is done by applicant himself/herself. But applicant didn't fill the IMM5476 form.
3. Applicant paid someone (unauthorized lawyer/consultant), the applicant fills the application form, write documents, EE system, uploads files himself/herself, but he/she asks questions and sends filled form, EE, documents to the consultant for review and revise (if necessary). The contact info and email box is the applicant's.
In a word, the applicant do things and communicate with IRCC himself/herself. But he/she has a paid unauthorized consultant help him/her on documents and forms and not fill the IMM5476 form.
IMO, before that post published, 1 & 2 & 3 all could be considered as "misrepresentation", but after my post replied, it seems to me 1 & 2 is "misrepresentation", 3 is safe.
So may I have your reply and opinion?
Sorry again to bother you.
Your understanding and kind heart is highly appreciated!
All the best of luck to you!
Laini