Any answer to these questions would be pure speculation, so better take the discussion to the other thread: http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/bill-c6-senate-stage-t461681.4710.html .
So you are saying Senator Linda Frum is wrong? Check this tweet -- https://twitter.com/LindaFrum/status/852240592289619969
It says Conservative Senators are proposing amendment to keep 4/6 vs Liberal's 3/5.
CIC will know you have applied for Quebec's immigration program. That shows you have 'intent to live in Quebec' and so your CEC application will most likely be refused.
I don't see why you're assuming such amendments are/will be totally against the core of a government bill. Like the language amendment, residency amendment is also going to be a compromise between both sides.
So where all the the residency amendment skeptics now? I did say this earlier and quoting it again:
It's not going to be C24ish. That's nonsense. It's going to be a compromise between C-6 and C-24. Be prepared for it.
IRCC does not make any guarantees about the processing time.
80% cases are processed within 6 months, but you and your employer just can't assume you are NOT going to be among the unlucky 20%.
Furthermore, LMIA is a complicated process and not part of PR application.
You can only blame your...