I am sorry if I offended you, that was not my intention. Maybe I misunderstood when you said what "might happen" as to what you "wanted to happen" just the way many seem to be suggesting how IRCC should do their job in this forum.
Also I was not attacking you after going out of logic and facts. It looked like you were overstating facts when you said 80k out of 90k quota, so I thought facts were irrelevant in this situation. Even in this reply, you seem to think that 90% of the new immigrants are from one country, which is overstating the facts again.
85k/341k = approx 25% of total immigs or 41K/89K = 46% of EE ITAs which is half or less of your estimates. I know these numbers are more to be coming from one country, but just to give another fact, out of 7.7billion world population 1.3 billion are Indian. so that is about 17% of world population you are talking about. Sorry if there is more competition coming.
When I said even if this trend continues for the next 10 years the number would be insignificant to cause political issues and you seemed to not accept it, it looked like logic was taking a hit. Currently projected population in Canada by 2030 is 41million. So if this trend of 80k Indians/year were to continue for the next 10 years Canadian population of Indian origin would not be more than 1.8million given in 2020 it is about 1million. let's say I exaggerate and if it were to come to 2.5 million i.e, 2.5mil/41mil = approx 6% of the population. Do you think 6% will really affect the political situation of the country? currently, there is about 5% of the Chinese origin population in Canada. Do you see a huge political impact in their favor?
When you suggested that a certain idea might help in avoiding what may happen it seemed like you were suggesting that idea to be implemented by IRCC in a forum where there are other hopeful immigrants. Again sorry for misrepresenting your intentions. My intention was only to ask you not to worry too much over what might or might not happen and hurt the sentiments of others in this forum while doing so based on unreasonable fears and I might have gone overboard with my previous reply for which I apologize for offending if I did.
I've already replied to the numbers argument, 85k/341k is diluting the impact because you want to decrease the ratio by adding a lot of irrelevant immigration categories like sponsorship and refugees, which don't count as economic migrants. if you want to say 85k on 195k, total economic migrants across all programs, i would at least say that is reasonable.
And 195k is all the intake across all economic immigration programs, which we can't compare because we don't have the breakdown for them, and this figure is for all places available, it doesn't mean all of them will be filled during the year. So that means the total actual figures could be less, but what we do know is that usually EE fulfills its quota annually.
The article doesn't specify whether for 2019 it is the total number across all categories or just EE, so i'm not taking it as the gospel truth. But i'm just saying, the trend is clear that Indians are dominating EE at a rate which is very high. We don't have the end of year report for 2019, but as i demonstrated for 2018, the numbers are almost the same for the numbers admitted as per the 2018 report. So it's very reasonable to assume that the numbers for 2019 will be similar, and yes, over 80k for 90k places for EE is almost 90% of PRs for EE, which is the main program for economic immigrants.
That's very possibly a concern for diversity.
As for the overall impact, i think this is subjective because different people have different definitions for what is a potential issue or cause for concern when it comes to demographics. However, i will say this, if you want to assess the impact of this it's more useful to analyse it by area. So for example, the GTA is about 51% Indian, if this consistent and significant annual influx of Indian immigrants settle in this area over the years (as would be expected), then you will have an even greater majority of Indians living there. This will obviously have a negative effect on diversity in the vicinity. But putting that aside, what is clear is that certainly the argument that there isn't enough diversity for PRs admitted through EE recently is valid numerically.
Again, for the record, this is not specifically targeted towards Indians, the same concerns would be just as valid if we were talking about any other country.
Anyhow, it's a very interesting discussion but i think it's time to refocus on the topic at hand in this thread. And i wish everyone luck, regardless of where they come from.