You called them, asked the question that you were asking here about, and didn't bother mentioning what they told you? Did it not seem like relevant information? Does that seem fair to others here, to ask a question and not mention the most relevant info?
My question was about sending them the letter my manager wrote, I didn’t ask them this specific question about the letter and how would it affect my timeline if I sent it through the Webform. I asked them an update on my application and that’s what they told me, that it’s in queue. My next step was to request them to expedite oath after knowing it’s in queue. The question I was asking here is completely different.
The main issue is visa appointments, they’re not available in the near future. Hoping the oath gets scheduled soon so I need not worry about the visa. Thank you for your response!
Your question is primarily (only) relevant in context of whether you're likely to get an oath ceremony in advance (i.e without asking for urgent consideration). Hence being told by phone it's being scheduled is very relevant to whether it's even worth asking for urgent treatment and whether or not it would be treated as urgent.
Which office is processing your application? Have you confirmed via GCMS, the call centre, or a fingerprint request email?
Primary office is Vancouver. On the call IRCC agent said my application is in queue at local office, which is Ottawa. (Event office is Ottawa). I did not order GCMS notes, did not receive FP request. I received test email from NGF though, but agent said primary VO is Vancouver.
congrats!! in person/virtual?
