Ok. I have noted your points.
I still stand by the same impression I had previously, I have however amended my original post (you can see the "strikethrough" amendments in my post above).
By the way, I do not particularly have a problem with applying to a country simply because it has the "simplest application process". If that's the motivation for someone applying, just say so...stop beating around the bush. Actually, I would consider applying to the country I perceived as being the "easiest" (assuming it's a country I actually like). Others who are applying though might have other things that they need to also take into consideration before applying.
Despite being motivated to apply to a country because it's the "easiest", I would then do the necessary detailed background checks etc, etc on the country to then make an informed decision on why apply for "this" country instead of "that" country. By the time I actually file an application I would be quite familiar with the details of the country, the application process etc, etc.
Australia strikes me as having a more "straight forward" PR application process. The cost appears to be more though. My biggest concern with Australian PR application process would be the ECA process, it seems to be an "involved" process.....compared to the Canadian ECA process (WES in particular, using WES is simple).
Note also, that unlike Canada where its mainly your educational credential that is being assessed, in Australia (, my understanding is,) it's your actual work skills/experience that are being assessed
along with your educational credential(s). This is done in Australia by the professional association that your occupation is affiliated with. And this assessment for Australian PR is being done by people (at the professional association) who actually know the profession and understand your stated skills/experience......the skills "assessment" is
not being done by immigration officers.
So for example, the NOC 2174 and 2147 type applicants (see the Australian "NOC" equivalents below), it's the
Australian Computer Society (ACS) and the
Engineers Australia that does the assessment.
261111 - ICT business Analyst - ACS
261112 - Systems Analyst - ACS
263111 - Computer Network and Systems Engineer - ACS
263311 - Telecommunications Engineer - Engineers Australia
263312 - Telecommunications Network Engineer - Engineers Australia
313213 - Telecommunications Network Planner - Engineers Australia
313214 - Telecommunications Technical Officer or Technologist - Engineers Australia
However, in spite of the (apparent/supposed) difficulty of filing a Canadian PR application, I would most likely gravitate towards Canada because I am more familiar with Canada, but more importantly, I am more familiar with the Canadian PR application process (thanks to CanadaVisa forums). I am yet to find an equivalent active "
AustraliaVisa" forum online. I have seen other Australian immigration sites, but the quality of the content is relatively poor.
Unfortunately I am not familiar with forum member
lloydnina posts, can you provide links to the specific posts you are referring to?
myluckyprincess said:
i disagree on people applying to a country because it has simplest application process. if you've read the reasons why a forum member (lloydnina) chose canada, it's not all about because the application was easy. i guess we have this topic NOT because we want to discuss a right detailed decision making to reach a conclusion that ca is better than au or vice versa. everything that's shared in a forum is always a biased comment. people i think just want to hear others' opinion about these countries based on their experiences and not on a systematic kind of way.
cheers!