ronaldoyaronaldo said:
biometrix
In the CIC website they say one of the rare reasons you could be rejected after getting nominated is having insufficient funds. Does that apply to people applying from within Canada too?
For pnp applicants, There are three bases upon which a provincial nominee who meets all statutory admissibility
requirements can be refused a visa:
1). The officer has reason to believe that the applicant does not intend to live in the province that has nominated them; (for persons with ties to other province)
2).The officer has reason to believe that the applicant is unlikely to be able to successfully
establish economically in Canada; (for persons without a job offer, arranged offer of employment or proof of funds)
3). The officer has reason to believe that the applicant is participating in, or intends to participate in, a passive investment or an immigration-linked investment scheme as defined in R87(5) to
R87(9) of the Regulations. (for business investors)
In each case, the officer must have some evidence to support this belief and overcome the
presumptions implied by the provincial nomination. Every provincial nominee agreement obliges
the immigration officer to consult with an official of the nominating province regarding the intention to refuse before the refusal is actually made (Please see Appendix B for Provincial Contact
Information).
If the officer, after consulting with the province, still intends to refuse, R87(4) requires that a
second officer concur with the decision to refuse, before it can be made official. Both officers'
names should be clearly recorded in the CAIPS notes. cic et al, Op 2, (2011)
