Hey, i have the same status on my Ups tracking number"7.36am Signed by ADUSEI"something is wrong therepacific2016 said:Anyone from UPS charged CC? Please share your comment. Mine was received at 7.36am Signed by ADUSEI.
Thanks!!
Wow I am in the same boat (purolator 10:08) but no charge yetmasoom1 said:Guys
I sent through purolator, Application reached at 10:08 as per their delivery time confirmation
Just got Charge,
I hope everyone get charge soon
Eluka80 said:Hey, i have the same status on my Ups tracking number"7.36am Signed by ADUSEI"something is wrong there
where did u send it from?
I am of that batch. Still waiting to be charged.randebutler said:Has anyone from the Purolator batch at 9:43am talked to the reporters about Purolators reported time?
With the 10:08 packages being charged now, it supports the idea that the 9:43 packages didn't arrive until the afternoon. I guess wait and see if more 10:08 ones get charged and if 9:43 ones get charged or not. It's one thing for them to go and come back later, its another thing to lie about delivery time.
No it doesnt, It just means CIC pretty much treats all apps collected within a certain timeline equally. If you read the reports, all the apps were basically going into cages. There is no guarantee that an app which reached earlier will be processed earlier. It just has a higher chance of being near the top.randebutler said:Has anyone from the Purolator batch at 9:43am talked to the reporters about Purolators reported time?
With the 10:08 packages being charged now, it supports the idea that the 9:43 packages didn't arrive until the afternoon. I guess wait and see if more 10:08 ones get charged and if 9:43 ones get charged or not. It's one thing for them to go and come back later, its another thing to lie about delivery time.
That's reassuring. The one time I would be happy to be wrong_MK_ said:No it doesnt, It just means CIC pretty much treats all apps collected within a certain timeline equally. If you read the reports, all the apps were basically going into cages. There is no guarantee that an app which reached earlier will be processed earlier. It just has a higher chance of being near the top.
This approach violates the concept of first come first serve basis on CIC's website._MK_ said:No it doesnt, It just means CIC pretty much treats all apps collected within a certain timeline equally. If you read the reports, all the apps were basically going into cages. There is no guarantee that an app which reached earlier will be processed earlier. It just has a higher chance of being near the top.
I strongly belive that my application got reach early, that's why it got charge, One of friend has sent application with me in same office, and when he asked delivery time , they told him 8:45, and they told me 10:08, Same batch same office same time we submitted, He got charge too just few minutes ago, So I beilve mine got delivered with him at 8:45 but they gave me wrong delivery timescreech339 said:This approach violates the concept of first come first serve basis on CIC's website.
That makes complete sense. The time stamp by courier are totally unreliable.masoom1 said:I strongly belive that my application got reach early, that's why it got charge, One of friend has sent application with me in same office, and when he asked delivery time , they told him 8:45, and they told me 10:08, Same batch same office same time we submitted, He got charge too just few minutes ago, So I beilve mine got delivered with him at 8:45 but they gave me wrong delivery time
Just my thought
I am also eagerly waiting for this one....Sponsor_2015 said:Does anyone use certified cheque got charged?