Brother, I'm just curious...MASunny said:Just to share my take on P103, it is written in almost all the CAIPS/GCMS notes like that "MEDS PRINTED P103 PREPARED FILE PA'D." No where it is mentioned like PI-03.
I have seen two GCMS notes (from Dubai applicants) & they both got medical request along with updated PCC & Schedule forms & fee and P103 was mentioned in their notes. So anyone having P103 in their notes wouldn't get the MR is highly unlikely.
Before, some members had discussed this & assumed that it looks like that: http://canadianvisaservices.com/gifs/testimonial2.jpg There is no way to ascertain this but others view point provide more info.
immigration.ca/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=75&PID=153756
There is no way to confirm that NOC has no relevance. Their prime relevance is evident that (1) some NOCs are not available in MI2 & MI3 such as 0213, (2) some are there in two MIs, or (3) SMSH list indicates some fast moving NOCs like GP/Physicians or FC (exceptions are everywhere when some NOC1111 got UDR).
So NOC has some value, but here CIC is stuck by taking the applications under MI1 and didn't processed them for long (wait que is 2 years for MI1). Now they have to 'throw away' all such cases positively or negatively. The negative route for CIC is DELAY (6-12mo, then 18 mo, then visa quota shortage etc.) the applicants. Just imagine in last 3 years, due to this delay, some applicants might had withdrawn their applications, changed their minds, or migrated to other destinations, or had died. Means CIC has to process less MI1 applications. So it appears that CIC is using UDR as a tool to delay your cases.
In my view, there's a need, like Pre-2008 applicants, someone should challenge CIC in FCC for 'MI1 Processing Unnecessary Delay.'
R u an applicant ?? If yes, which MI ? 1, 2 or 3...?
Would appreciate an answer. Thanks.