@The Wall yes, I attach GCMS notes to webforms every time. The CBSA notes show that officer who has approved the case and asked for RFV to be sent has also assigned the file to ”EE - Approved“ location in Montreal VO and gave them due date of 3-Mar-23 to (I guess) do the next step, which (I guess) is sending RFV email. Since notes were issued on 14-Mar-23 I can see that no one followed on this and also from no updates in my online accounts I can tell that they didn’t do it up till now.
I found
this description of the RFV procedure from IRCC itself. I can see that first 4 points out of 6 were done, but then 5th point is missing. And then the question is - who exactly is there to be blamed? Primary VO or secondary VO?
As per the procedure "
The overseas migration office should run GCMS reports or queries weekly either to identify new inter-office verification requests that have been created and assigned or to search for completed inter-office verification activities for applications assigned to their office." sounds like secondary VO is to be blamed for not checking that they need to issue RFV. But then in the CBSA notes on the 1st page the due date under "Application assignment" was given to primary VO.
So it's hard to tell precisely who didn't do their job.